· Private foundation
Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KWANDWE RHINO CONSERVATION TRUST CO DINO AND TRICHE CHOUEST | $20,000 |
| NOTRE DAME SEMINARY | $20,000 |
| JOHN CURTIS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $13,000 |
| SPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| GREAT HEARTS HARVEST SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC | $7,500 |
| TROOP C GRANT A WISH | $5,000 |
| TERREBONNE CHURCHES UNITED FOODBANK INC | $5,000 |
| SAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS | $5,000 |
| TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC4× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +24% · 38% of their budget
- LTLouisiana Trooper Foundation Inc2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +423% · 54% of their budget
- TOTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +226%
Funded once
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANSone grant, 2020 · $20k
- TATIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +90%
- TJTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assist in educational and community oriented programs that promote or improve the standing of the louisiana state police in the communities of louisiana. the organization also provides charitable relief assistance during times of crisis…
The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…
The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.
To advance the safety, security, and well-being of louisiana's law enforcement officers and their families by making available appropriate safety devices and/or training for law enforcement personnel, to the extent that local government is…
The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…
No board approved mission statement
The lsu foundation cultivates and invests in philanthropic partnerships to support and advance lsu's academic priorities.
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.
The mission of the louisiana state bar association is to assist its members in the practice of law, assure access to and aid in the administration of justice, assist the supreme court in the regulation of the practice of law, uphold the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bastion Community of Resilience. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS POLICE AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Louisiana Trooper Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
- Who funds HELIO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BASTION COMMUNITY OF RESILIENCE ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 610 STOMPERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLOVER NOLA INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds SAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN ↗
- Who funds Troop C Grant A Wish ↗
- Who funds Terrebonne Churches United Foodbank Inc ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Eugenie & Joseph Jones Family Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Acadiana · The Vincent Saia Foundation · Lauricella Land Company Foundation · The Joe W and Dorothy D Brown Foundation · The Almar Foundationdba The Alden and Margaret Laborde Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · United Way of Southeast Louisiana
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Interventional Cardiology Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.