Skip to content

· Private foundation

International Order of the Kings Daughters and Sons Hd Un of Circles

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$36kInternational$35kMembership Benefit$33kHuman Services$20kReligion$11kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$7kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,705
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KING$1,705
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%COVENANT TO CARE INC: $2k → 11%COVENANT TO CARE INC: $1k → 11%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%COVENANT TO CARE INC: $500 → 11%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%COVENANT TO CARE INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IA
CT
VA
AR
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$196k · 32 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 31 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
8

Total granted

$196k
$10k

Still filing today

34%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesMembership BenefitEducationInternationalAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF
    4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +38%
  • HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +37%
  • OC
    OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +235%

Funded once

  • CC
    CENTRAL COUNCIL
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • NA
    NATIVE AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • C3
    CHANNEL 3 KIDS CAMP
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
4
Odd Fellows Home of Connecticut Inc

Provide our residents with the best nursing care and rehabilitation services while enhancing the quality of their life in a dignified atmosphere by using the skills and compassion of our staff and utilizing the latest advances in…

—
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
The Hospital of Central Connecticut

The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
8
Companion Animal Welfare Society

Companion animal welfare society inc. supports the rhode island pet owning community by providing high quality veterinary care to economically challenged individuals and families.

—
9
Connecticut Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.

Crime & Legal
10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
12
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Connecticut Inc; the most unlike its peers is Faithcare Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KING: $23,494 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KINGIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAROUND THE WORLD DEPT: $8,000 · OtherAROUND THE WORLD DEPTHEALTH CAREERS SCHOLARSHIP DEPT: $8,000 · OtherHEALTH CAREERS SCHOLARSHIP DEPTSTUDENT MINISTRY SCHOLARSHIPS: $8,000 · OtherSTUDENT MINISTRY SCHOLARSHIPSNORTH AMERICAN INDIAN SCHOLARSHIPS: $6,000 · Other+26 more: $78,250 · Other+26 moreINTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS & SONS: $33,000 · Membership BenefitINTERNATIONAL ORDE…FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF: $4,000 · EducationHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 · InternationalOUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 · AnimalsFAITHCARE INC: $4,000 · ReligionALMADA LODGE TIMES FARM CAMP CORPORATION: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$146,744Membership Benefit$33,000Human Services$8,000Education$4,000International$4,000Animals$4,000Religion$4,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS & SONS: $33,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAITHCARE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP COURANT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALMADA LODGE TIMES FARM CAMP CORPORATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS & SONS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP COURANT INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALMADA LODGE TIMES FARM CAMP CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Aetna Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Order of the Kings Daughters and Sons Hd Un of Circles funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Order of the Kings Daughters and Sons Hd Un of Circles. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Covenant to Care for Children Inc: 35% of income from government
  • American School at Hartford for the Deaf: 32% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to International Order of the Kings Daughters and Sons Hd Un of Circles?

Find your warmest path to International Order of the Kings Daughters and Sons Hd Un of Circles through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Order of the Kings Daughters and Sons Hd Un of Circles’ filings →

More from the funding graph