Skip to content
International Medical Corps at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$435k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$3.4MEducation$2.6MHealth$1.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.6MPublic Benefit$164kPhilanthropy$54kHuman Services$23k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $1,268,683, the rows itemized in this filing. The $13,332,121 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,063,438 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $788k
  • $250k+1 grant · $435k
$165,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$133M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$434,507
THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC$230,327
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$197,062
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION$165,600
REFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE$117,451
CONCERN WORLDWIDE US INC$77,423
VENICE FAMILY CLINICS$25,000
PACIFIC CLINICS$21,313
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PACIFIC CLINICS: $21k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
AR
NC
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $12M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$4.4M · 37% · 13 grants

Stated purpose: 1 · 3 · 2

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$3.8M · 31% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: 1

Russia and Neighboring States$1.8M · 15% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: 1 · 3

Middle East and North Africa$1.1M · 9% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: 1 · 2

South America$941k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: 2,3

East Asia and the Pacific$64k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: 1

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 43% of International Medical Corps’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

International Medical Corpslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 8 repeat orgs$581k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$5.0M
$369k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+80%

Still filing today

88%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $212k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +64%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $431k · revenue +21%
  • A
    ARCARE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $170k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CF
    Center for US Global Leadershipgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $164k · revenue +124%
  • OH
    OCRACOKE HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $65k · revenue +80%
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $45k · revenue +108%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
2
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
Family Health Centers of San Diego Inc

Fhcsd's primary mission is to provide comprehensive, accessible and quality health care services to all income levels with a special committment to low income medically underserved individuals.

Health
5
Community Clinic of Maui Inc

To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.

Health
6
Salud Family Health

Salud is a federally qualified health center (fqhc), operating 13 clinic locations, 11 school sites, and a mobile unit. we provide medical, dental, pharmacy, and behavioral health care services to keep you and your family healthy.

Health
7
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
9
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
12
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ocracoke Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,170,355 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $2,198,495 · InternationalCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $431,241 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $405,815 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USAASOCIACION DE SALUD PRIMARIA DE PUERTO RICO INC: $722,424 · OtherASOCIACION DE SA…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $616,355 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRI…+2 more: $62,270 · OtherFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $238,061 · HealthARCARE: $169,714 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $165,600 · HealthOCRACOKE HEALTH CENTER INC: $65,000 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $45,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE: $215,481 · PhilanthropyCenter for US Global Leadership: $163,560 · Public BenefitAlimentacion Segura Infantil Asi: $22,800 · Human ServicesPACIFIC CLINICS: $21,313 · Human Services
Education$4,170,355International$3,035,551Other$1,401,049Health$718,375Philanthropy$215,481Public Benefit$163,560Human Services$44,113

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,170,355 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $2,198,495 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetASOCIACION DE SALUD PRIMARIA DE PUERTO RICO INC: $722,424 over 3y, 11% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $431,241 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $405,815 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $238,061 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE: $215,481 over 3y, 15% of budgetARCARE: $169,714 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for US Global Leadership: $163,560 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOCRACOKE HEALTH CENTER INC: $65,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $21,313 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMiami Beach Community Health Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefAmerican Cancer Socie…Americares Foundation…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Direct ReliefCA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Medical Corps funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Medical Corps. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Florida Association of Community Health Centers Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Family Health Centers of Southwest Florida Inc: 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to International Medical Corps?

Find your warmest path to International Medical Corps through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Medical Corps’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home