· Public charity
International Medical Corps
To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $1,268,683 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,332,121 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,063,438 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $788k
- $250k+1 grant · $435k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $434,507 |
| THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC | $230,327 |
| FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS | $197,062 |
| ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION | $165,600 |
| REFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE | $117,451 |
| CONCERN WORLDWIDE US INC | $77,423 |
| VENICE FAMILY CLINICS | $25,000 |
| PACIFIC CLINICS | $21,313 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $12M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: 1 · 3 · 2
Stated purpose: 1
Stated purpose: 1 · 3
Stated purpose: 1 · 2
Stated purpose: 2,3
Stated purpose: 1
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 43% of International Medical Corps’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $212k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CWCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC8× · 2018–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +64%
Save The Children Federation Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $431k · revenue +21%- AARCARE2× · 2022–2023 · $170k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- CFCenter for US Global Leadershipgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $164k · revenue +124%
- OHOCRACOKE HEALTH CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $65k · revenue +80%
- FHFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $45k · revenue +108%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Fhcsd's primary mission is to provide comprehensive, accessible and quality health care services to all income levels with a special committment to low income medically underserved individuals.
To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
Salud is a federally qualified health center (fqhc), operating 13 clinic locations, 11 school sites, and a mobile unit. we provide medical, dental, pharmacy, and behavioral health care services to keep you and your family healthy.
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.
To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ocracoke Health Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC ↗
- Who funds ASOCIACION DE SALUD PRIMARIA DE PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ARCARE ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Center for US Global Leadership ↗
- Who funds OCRACOKE HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Alimentacion Segura Infantil Asi ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
- Who funds Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Medical Corps funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Florida Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
- Miami Beach Community Health Center Inc — 13% of income from government
- Family Health Centers of Southwest Florida Inc — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to International Medical Corps?
Find your warmest path to International Medical Corps through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.