Skip to content
International Disaster Emergency Service Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Disaster Emergency Service Inc

International disaster emergency service, inc.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.4MHuman Services$279kCrime & Legal$35kEducation$20kRecreation & Sports$15kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $240,768, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,165,428 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,924,660 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH DADE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$75,000
CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF ST PETERSBURG INC$39,768
ZEPHYR CHRISTIAN CHURCH$36,000
RUSSELL CAVE CHURCH OF CHRIST$20,000
FAITH CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
HARVESTER CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
CHURCH OF CHRIST OF MARTINS FERRY$10,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH ARCADIA$10,000
COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
WHITE MILLS CHRISTIAN CAMP$10,000
GATEWAY CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $579k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES: $125k → 13%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $35k → 18%ACTIVE GRACE: $9k → 5%CROSS ROADS MISSIONS: $10k → 15%SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES: $125k → 13%SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES: $100k → 13%SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES: $75k → 13%SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES: $50k → 13%SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $3.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$841k · 25% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT, DISCIPLESHIP · DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP · DEVELOPMENT, DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP

Central America and the Caribbean$821k · 25% · 20 grants

Stated purpose: DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP · DEVELOPMENT, DISCIPLESHIP · DEVELOPMENT, DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP

East Asia and the Pacific$792k · 24% · 22 grants

Stated purpose: DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP · CHURCH PLANTING · DEVELOPMENT, DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP

South Asia$456k · 14% · 13 grants

Stated purpose: DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP · DEVELOPMENT, DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP

Russia and Neighboring States$230k · 7% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP · DEVELOPMENT, DISCIPLESHIP · DISCIPLESHIP

Middle East and North Africa$127k · 4% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$64k · 2% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: DISASTER, DISCIPLESHIP

South America$10k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT, DISCIPLESHIP

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 21 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
50

Total granted

$4.1M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+9%

Still filing today

29%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $241k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DISASTER ASSISTANCE COC INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +209%
  • MC
    MID-SOUTH CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • MP
    MASTER PROVISIONS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $18k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • OU
    OTHER UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2017 · $447k
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF PANAMA CITY
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • BA
    BAY AREA CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Ministries
International
2
Christian Ministries International
—
3
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
4
Arrow Creek International Ministrie Stands Over Bull
Religion
5
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
6
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
7
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
8
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
9
Grace Bible Mission Society

We are a religious organization that receives and distributes to domestic missionaries.

Religion
10
Adventist Mountain Missions
Religion
11
Empower Ministries International

A global missions organization that exists to strengthen and equip national Churches around the world, and to assist in revitalizing the Church in America.

Religion
12
Activation International Ministries

Teaching and ministering to pastors internationally and in the usa.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sharing Hope Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Africa Fire Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW DAY CHRISTIAN CHURCH AT PORT CHARLOTTE INC: $804,679 · OtherNEW DAY CHRISTIAN CHURCH AT PORT CHARLOTTE INCCURRENT A CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $672,500 · OtherCURRENT A CHRISTIAN CHURCHOTHER UNDER 5000: $446,823 · OtherOTHER UNDER 5000CROSSBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $315,000 · OtherCROSSBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCHCHRIST COVENANT CHURCH: $259,293 · OtherTWO RIVERS CHURCH OF CHRIST: $220,271 · OtherCHRISTIAN CHURCH OF PANAMA CITY: $200,000 · OtherEKKLESIA CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $195,000 · Other+58 more: $2,385,204 · Other+58 moreSHARING HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $525,000 · Human ServicesSHARING HO…COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesCOOKSON HI…+2 more: $18,500 · Human ServicesThe Ark Christian Ministries: $38,525 · ReligionKAIROS BENEVOLENCE FUND: $15,000 · ReligionARIZONA RESERVATION MINISTRIES: $15,000 · ReligionTHE 25 GROUP: $10,000 · ReligionCHRIST REACHING ASIA MISSION WORLDWIDE INC: $10,000 · ReligionAFRICAN CHRISTIAN RESTORATION EVANGELISM: $7,000 · ReligionDISASTER ASSISTANCE COC INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterAMERICAN REHABILITATION MINISTRY INC: $45,000 · Crime & LegalMOUNTAIN MISSION SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · EducationMID-SOUTH CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $20,000 · EducationAFRICA FIRE MISSION: $26,000 · InternationalWHITE MILLS CHRISTIAN CAMP INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,498,770Human Services$578,500Religion$95,525Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Crime & Legal$45,000Education$40,000International$26,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARING HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $525,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetDISASTER ASSISTANCE COC INC: $50,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetAMERICAN REHABILITATION MINISTRY INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAFRICA FIRE MISSION: $26,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMID-SOUTH CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMASTER PROVISIONS INC: $18,160 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKAIROS BENEVOLENCE FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCrossroads Missions: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWHITE MILLS CHRISTIAN CAMP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE 25 GROUP: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCHRIST REACHING ASIA MISSION WORLDWIDE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACTIVE GRACE INC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: $8,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARING HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PUERTO RICO MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds DISASTER ASSISTANCE COC INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN REHABILITATION MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ark Christian Ministries ↗
  • Who funds COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA FIRE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitabl…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN5.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Disaster Emergency Service Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Disaster Emergency Service Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Disaster Emergency Service Inc?

    Find your warmest path to International Disaster Emergency Service Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Disaster Emergency Service’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home