Skip to content
International Christian Concern Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Christian Concern Inc

To assist Christians who are victims of persecution and discrimination, calling upon Christians and other religious faiths to provide such support and assistance to those who suffer from persecution and discrimination because of their religious faith, and to come to their aid to secure their right of free practice of religion, while…

$1.8M
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$544kInternational$414kCivil Rights$73kHuman Services$19kPublic Benefit$8k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $85,776, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,765,920 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,680,144 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$14,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION INDIA$28,959
SAWA FOUNDATION$16,020
CALVARY BURMESE CHURCH$14,500
BOAT$10,942
CHINA AID ASSOCIATION$9,300
S4CA$6,055
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOAT: $11k → 6%BPSOS: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MI
NY
WY
IN
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $207k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$177k · 86% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Grantmaking

Sub-Saharan Africa$16k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Grantmaking

Middle East and North Africa$14k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Grantmaking

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$947k · 14 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$947k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+53%

Still filing today

57%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Human Friends Organization International Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $105k · revenue +103%
  • CA
    China Aid Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $74k · revenue +26%
  • AA
    Assyrian Aid Society of America Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $63k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVICES GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • FT
    Free the Oppressedgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • TI
    TRANSFORM IRAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +347%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Radio Outreach

Our Gospel Radio Program in Arabic was inaugurated in 1993, broadcast from the Middle East on 5 transmitters and on the internet. Approximately 350 million Arabs can receive the programs. Our Farsi Gospel Radio Program was inaugurated in…

Religion
2
Asia Harvest Inc

To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia

International
3
Asia Connect

The organizations mission is the support, training, and equipping of Christian missionaries to Asia, the Middle East, and Africa

Religion
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
Project Doxa Inc

We support Christian missionaries and help with humanitarian aid and relief around the globe.

Religion
6
Ariana Ministries Incorporated

Ariana Ministries is an Afghan-led ministry carrying out the Great Commission by planting and supporting churches among the Afghan people groups. We focus on evengelism, discipleship, leaders training and providing pastoral care and…

Religion
7
Frontier Alliance International Inc

FAI is a disciple making ministry trying to reach the least reached peoples with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and mercy ministries.

Religion
8
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
9
Word of God Speak

Supporting and opening new churches around the world.

Religion
10
Global Outreach Mission Inc

Global Outreach Mission, Inc. is an inter-denominational foreign and domestic ministry organization that is engaged in a wide variety of ministries, including church planting, Christian camps, personal work, literature, community…

Religion
11
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
12
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transform Iran Inc; the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION INDIA: $292,729 · OtherMISSION INDIAOPERATION MOBILIZATION: $72,531 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATIONHEALING GRACE ARAB WORLD MINISTRY: $72,387 · OtherHEALING GRACE ARAB WORLD MINISTRYCALVARY BURMESE BAPTIST CHURCH: $40,950 · OtherCALVARY BURMESE BAPTIST CHURCHMISSION INDIA: $28,959 · Other+5 more: $70,603 · Other+5 moreHuman Friends Organization International Inc: $105,450 · InternationalHuman Friends Organizatio…Assyrian Aid Society of America Inc: $62,691 · InternationalAssyrian Aid Society of A…SAWA FOUNDATION: $25,583 · InternationalSAWA FOUNDATIONFree the Oppressed: $10,000 · InternationalGNBC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $9,475 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $8,863 · International+2 more: $11,735 · InternationalSERVANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL: $104,213 · ReligionSERVANT GROUP INTERNATIO…China Aid Association Inc: $74,345 · ReligionChina Aid Association In…TELLASIA MINISTRIES INC: $22,266 · ReligionTELLASIA MINISTRIES INCTRANSFORM IRAN INC: $9,840 · Religion+3 more: $15,660 · Religion+3 moreBOAT PEOPLE S O S INC: $19,418 · Human Services
Other$578,159International$233,797Religion$226,324Human Services$19,418

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHuman Friends Organization International Inc: $105,450 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetSERVANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL: $104,213 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetChina Aid Association Inc: $74,345 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetAssyrian Aid Society of America Inc: $62,691 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetSAWA FOUNDATION: $25,583 over 2y, 23% of budgetTELLASIA MINISTRIES INC: $22,266 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBOAT PEOPLE S O S INC: $19,418 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Defense Forum Foundation Inc: $17,915 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFree the Oppressed: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSFORM IRAN INC: $9,840 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetS4CA INC: $6,055 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANANIAS HOUSE: $5,680 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVISION BEYOND BORDERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Servant FoundationNatl Christian Charit…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Christian Community Foundation IncCO17.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Christian Concern Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Christian Concern Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Christian Concern Inc?

    Find your warmest path to International Christian Concern Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $209k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Christian Concern’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home