· Public charity
International Christian Concern Inc
To assist Christians who are victims of persecution and discrimination, calling upon Christians and other religious faiths to provide such support and assistance to those who suffer from persecution and discrimination because of their religious faith, and to come to their aid to secure their right of free practice of religion, while…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $85,776 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,765,920 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,680,144 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSION INDIA | $28,959 |
| SAWA FOUNDATION | $16,020 |
| CALVARY BURMESE CHURCH | $14,500 |
| BOAT | $10,942 |
| CHINA AID ASSOCIATION | $9,300 |
| S4CA | $6,055 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $207k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Grantmaking
Stated purpose: Grantmaking
Stated purpose: Grantmaking
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHuman Friends Organization International Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $105k · revenue +103%
- CAChina Aid Association Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $74k · revenue +26%
- AAAssyrian Aid Society of America Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $63k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- GSGLOBAL SERVICES GROUP LLCone grant, 2020 · $11k
- FTFree the Oppressedgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +34%
- TITRANSFORM IRAN INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +347%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our Gospel Radio Program in Arabic was inaugurated in 1993, broadcast from the Middle East on 5 transmitters and on the internet. Approximately 350 million Arabs can receive the programs. Our Farsi Gospel Radio Program was inaugurated in…
To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia
The organizations mission is the support, training, and equipping of Christian missionaries to Asia, the Middle East, and Africa
Religious
We support Christian missionaries and help with humanitarian aid and relief around the globe.
Ariana Ministries is an Afghan-led ministry carrying out the Great Commission by planting and supporting churches among the Afghan people groups. We focus on evengelism, discipleship, leaders training and providing pastoral care and…
FAI is a disciple making ministry trying to reach the least reached peoples with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and mercy ministries.
i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.
Supporting and opening new churches around the world.
Global Outreach Mission, Inc. is an inter-denominational foreign and domestic ministry organization that is engaged in a wide variety of ministries, including church planting, Christian camps, personal work, literature, community…
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Christian Ministry Activities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transform Iran Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Human Friends Organization International Inc ↗
- Who funds SERVANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds China Aid Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Assyrian Aid Society of America Inc ↗
- Who funds SAWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TELLASIA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOAT PEOPLE S O S INC ↗
- Who funds The Defense Forum Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORM IRAN INC ↗
- Who funds GNBC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds S4CA INC ↗
- Who funds ANANIAS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds International Antioch Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALING GRACE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds VISION BEYOND BORDERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Christian Concern Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to International Christian Concern Inc?
Find your warmest path to International Christian Concern Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.