Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical

Labor Union

$247k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$220kEmployment$101kPhilanthropy$49kMembership Benefit$33kHealth$20kCivil Rights$10kPublic Benefit$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $161,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $246,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $85,350 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teamsters Scholarship Fund$125,000
Worker Solidarity and Defense Foundation$20,000
All Charities Teamsters$11,000
San Francisco Labor Council$5,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Teamsters Local 25 Autism Fund: $10k → 16%San Mateo Central Labor Council: $18k → 7%All Charities Teamsters: $18k → 10%2018 San Francisco Inaugural Fund: $5k → 10%No on Prop 22 sponsored by Labor Organizations: $60k → 12%Teamsters Local 431: $10k → 19%Working Families Organization: $10k → 20%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $125k → 14%Worker Solidarity and Defense Foundation: $20k → 9%Teamsters Local 25 Autism Fund: $10k → 16%San Mateo Central Labor Council: $6k → 7%All Charities Teamsters: $11k → 10%Jobs With Justice SF: $5k → 10%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $75k → 14%Alameda County Central Labor Council: $5k → 10%All Charities Teamsters: $15k → 10%JR Hoffa Memorial Scholarship Fund: $10k → 14%All Charities Teamsters: $5k → 10%San Francisco Labor Council: $6k → 10%We Rise SF Labor Center for Immigrant: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 6 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$323k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
0%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    American Federation of Labor
    2× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +118%
  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue ×23 · 36% of their budget
  • SF
    San Francisco Labor Council
    2× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • CT
    Coalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • TL
    Teamsters Local 431
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • WF
    WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Labor Federation Afl-Cio

The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.

—
2
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
3
American Federation of Labor&Congress of Industrial Orgs Napa&Solano

Labor organization

—
4
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs - Ak

To protect the rights and imrprove the working conditions of working alaskans.

—
5
Washington State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.

—
6
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
7
Transport Workers Union of America

None

—
8
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations

The organization is a federation of labor unions. its mission is to improve the lives of working families - to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
9
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
10
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
11
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
12
Virginia Afl-Cio

The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Federation of Labor & Alameda Labor Council; the most unlike its peers is 2018 San Francisco Inaugural Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $200,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND …JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $60,000 · OtherCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers spo…Teamsters All Charities Fund: $49,000 · OtherTeamsters All Charities FundAmerican Federation of Labor: $23,262 · OtherAmerican Federation of LaborSan Francisco Labor Council: $10,600 · OtherSan Francisco Labor CouncilTeamsters Local 431: $10,000 · OtherTeamsters Local 431+3 more: $15,000 · Other+3 moreWORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EmploymentTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $20,000 · HealthWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Education$220,000Other$167,862Employment$20,000Health$20,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $200,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $49,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetAmerican Federation of Labor: $23,262 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetWORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco Labor Council: $10,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget2018 San Francisco Inaugural Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sanitary Truck Driver…International Brother…Brotherhood of Teamst…General Drivers Wareh…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Union Local…International Brother…
Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and SanCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson · Brotherhood of Teamsters Auto Truck drivers Line drivers Car haulers & hel · General Drivers Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union 89 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt · International Brotherhood of Teamsters

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home