How much did INTEGRA FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

International$442kHealth$436kPhilanthropy$238kEducation$103kHousing & Shelter$53kHuman Services$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kScience & Tech$22kCivil Rights$20kOther$861k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

tumor researcheducation patientspatients caregiverscaregivers learnlearn latestlatest advancesadvances brain

2021

india covidhealth disparitiesrelief indiacovid responseneurotraumacamptraining

2022

committeeprincetonchildren'sdirect reliefplastic surgeryinternationalchildrens

2023

children'sdirect reliefinternationalprincetonchildrens

2024

cafoutreachfirefightersinternationalneurological surgeonshealingprinceton

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k95 grants · $365k
$10k–50k14 grants · $226k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$353k

Total assets

Largest grants

Americares Foundation$25,000
Direct Relief$25,000
Neurocritical Care Society$25,000
Agnes Marshall Walker Foundation$20,000
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Foundation$18,000
United Negro College Fund$17,250
AORN Foundation$16,000
Brain and Spine Group Inc$15,000
Dental Lifeline Network$12,000
Childrens Burn Foundation$12,000
CAF America$10,870
American Association of Neurological Surgeons$10,000
Plastic Surgery Foundation$10,000
Childrens Brain Tumor Foundation$10,000
Chapel & York US FoundationNew York NY 10019$9,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 58% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.7M · 79 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

79 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.7M

$276k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+17%

Still filing today

73%

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Americares Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $193k · revenue +49%
Direct Relief
5× · 2020–2024 · $185k · revenue +93%
NC
Neurocritical Care Society
5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +56%

Funded once

NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMSgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +128%
TIDES FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +23%
AM
AGNES MARSHAL WALKER FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

American Academy of Neurology

The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is the leading voice in brain health. As the world's largest association of neurologists and neuroscience professionals with more than 40,000 members, the AAN offers access to continuing education,…

Community Improvement

American Association of Neurosurgeons

The AANS promotes the highest quality of patient care and advances the specialty of neurological surgery.

Health

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Inc

Enhance health and improve lives worldwide through advancement of education and scientific exchange.

Health

The Radiosurgery Society

The Radiosurgery Society is a multi-disciplinary non-profit organization, consisting of surgeons, radiation oncologists, physicists, and allied health professionals, who are dedicated to advancing the science and clinical practice of SRS,…

Community Improvement

Society for Neuroscience

And by encouraging translational research and the application of new scientific knowledge to develop improved disease treatments and cures. 2. provide professional development activities, information, and educational resources for…

Health

Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—

The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc

To raise funds to support charitable, educational & scientific purposes of its tax-exempt affiliate the hospital for special surg, & other hlth care related charitable orgs.

Health

Brain Research Foundation

Support of neuroscience research to advance the understanding of brain function and treatment.

Health

International Pain and Spine

To lead the advancement of science and standards for interventional pain medicine

Philanthropy

Surgical Review Corporation

To provide guidelines and certification for those hospitals and surgeons who practice surgery.

Health

Global Nerve Foundation

The mission of the GNF is to improve the lives of people with peripheral nerve problems through advancing and promoting excellence in nerve care.

Health

Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/100

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

98 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

97/98

Grantees still filing

72/98

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$929,763International$441,500Health$435,700Philanthropy$237,900Education$102,850Housing & Shelter$53,000Human Services$43,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Citizens Philanthropic Foundation IncNJ24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Christopher Reeve Foundation · S&P Global Foundation · Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc · Tenacre Foundation · The Allergan Foundation · Henry L Guenther Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation INTEGRA FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

16get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Agnes Marshall Walker Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 464035303 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Agnes Marshall Walker Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Integra Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Integra Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

INTEGRA FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?