· Private foundation
Integra Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k96 grants · $370k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $226k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Neurocritical Care Society | $25,000 |
| Americares Foundation | $25,000 |
| Direct Relief | $25,000 |
| Agnes Marshall Walker Foundation | $20,000 |
| Congress of Neurological Surgeons Foundation | $18,000 |
| United Negro College Fund | $17,250 |
| AORN Foundation | $16,000 |
| Brain and Spine Group Inc | $15,000 |
| Childrens Burn Foundation | $12,000 |
| Dental Lifeline Network | $12,000 |
| CAF America | $10,870 |
| American Association of Neurological Surgeons | $10,000 |
| Childrens Brain Tumor Foundation | $10,000 |
| Plastic Surgery Foundation | $10,000 |
| Chapel & York US FoundationNew York NY 10019 | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
84 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $176k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $218k · revenue +28%
DIRECT RELIEF5× · 2020–2024 · $185k · revenue +20%- NCNEUROCRITICAL CARE SOCIETY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +64%
Funded once
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -29%- CBChildren's Brain Tumor Foundationone grant, 2021 · $15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
The cns exists to enhance health and improve lives through the advancement of neurosurgical education and scientific exchange.
To fund research to discover cures and more effective treatments for neuroendocrine cancers. the netrf is committed to improving the lives of those affected by neuroendocrine cancer by providing information & educational resources.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
One world surgery's mission is to ignite the spirit of service and transform lives by providing access to high-quality surgical care globally.
As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…
Asps promotes the highest standards in advocacy, research, education, patient safety, and ethical standards for plastic surgery, our members, and their patients.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The National Children's Cancer Society and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds NEUROCRITICAL CARE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AGNES MARSHALL WALKER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AORN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLASTIC SURGERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SURGERY OF THE HAND ↗
- Who funds ISLES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds THINKFIRST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERS FOR HEALING ↗
- Who funds THE TIGERLILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Fighting Childrens Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds NEUROSURGERY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC ↗
- Who funds Burn Institute ↗
- Who funds TECH IMPACT ↗
- Who funds CONGRESS OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Excellence in Education ↗
- Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NEURAL THERAPY & REPAIR INC ↗
- Who funds FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS ↗
- Who funds Physicians For Peace ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Oceanfirst Foundation · Robert & Joan Dircks Foundation Inc · FirstBank Charitable Foundation Inc · Christopher Reeve Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Merck Foundation a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Integra Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kessler Foundation Inc — 54% of income from government
- The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey — 43% of income from government
- Portland Street Medicine — 32% of income from government
- Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
- United Way of Greater Mercer County — 8% of income from government
- Opportunity Project Inc — 6% of income from government
- Arm in Arm Inc — 4% of income from government
- Grounds for Sculpture Inc — 1% of income from government
- Students 2 Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- The College of New Jersey Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Integra Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Integra Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.