Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Institute for Public Health Innovation

Iphi develops multi-sector partnerships and innovative solutions to improve the public's health and well-being across maryland, virginia and the district of columbia.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$262k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Health$3.4MEmployment$2.5MHuman Services$761kEducation$619kFood & Nutrition$552kCommunity Improvement$74kPhilanthropy$35kYouth Development$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 29 grants below total $1,839,722 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,058,497 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $218,775 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k20 grants · $686k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $892k
  • $250k+1 grant · $262k
$40,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUANTIFIED VENTURES LLC$262,011
VIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION$200,266
PIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES INC (PATHS)$165,376
CAPITAL CENTER OF VIRGINIA DBA URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS$124,486
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$110,296
RICHMOND CITY HEALTH DISTRICT$96,275
CENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES$69,911
SACRED HEART CENTER INC$65,610
HEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER$59,483
MINORITY AIDS SUPPORT SERVICES INC$48,974
HEALTH BRIGADE$40,636
MAINEGENERAL HEALTH$40,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS$40,000
TENNESSEE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS ASSOCIATION$40,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $841k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TENNESSEE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 14%RHODE ISLAND PARENT INFORMATION NETWORK: $40k → 7%SHABACH MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 11%NEW FUTURES: $6k → 14%URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS: $300k → 22%URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS: $261k → 22%CAPITAL CENTER OF VIRGINIA DBA URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS: $124k → 22%URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS: $55k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ND
MI
NY
PA
RI
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.7M · 19 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$6.7M
$831k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+15%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $469k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAPITAL CENTER OF VIRGINIA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $740k · revenue +14%
  • VH
    VIRGINIA HOSPITAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $708k · revenue +18%
  • PA
    PIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $634k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BF
    BREAD FOR THE CITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +39%
  • VC
    VA - CHW ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $139k · revenue -45%
  • S
    SeniorNavigatorcom
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peninsula Institute for Community Health

Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.

Health
2
Greater Prince William Area Community Health Center Inc

The center's mission is to provide comprehensive, integrated and coordinated quality healthcare for the entire family.

Health
3
Shenandoah Valley Medical System I

To promote health and wellness within the community by providing a medical home to reduce barriers to care and ensure access to a full range of coordinated health care and wellness services.

Health
4
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
5
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
6
District of Columbia Primary Care Association

To create healthier communities through advocacy and the strengthening and support of health information technology (hit) & health information exchange (hie) infrastructure to support a high quality, equitable, integrated health care…

Health
7
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
8
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
9
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
10
Whitman-Walker Clinic Inc

Health center with comprehensive community-based medical, behavioral, dental and various navigation, outreach, engagement and education supports for underserved communities and specific expertise in lgbtq and hiv care.

Health
11
Hh Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
12
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piedmont Access to Health Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Va - Chw Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr15%40%35–55yr15%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%19%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr15%32%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,420

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

QUANTIFIED VENTURES — $906,383 · OtherQUANTIFIED VENTURESVIRGINIA HOSPITAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $707,592 · OtherVIRGINIA HOSPITAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY — $607,532 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION — $564,073 · OtherVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONVIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION — $542,717 · OtherVIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATIONHEALTH BRIGADE — $221,880 · OtherSACRED HEART CENTER INC — $180,443 · OtherWHITMAN-WALKER — $162,780 · Other+15 more — $491,558 · Other+15 morePIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES INC — $634,110 · HealthPIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SER…HEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER INC — $250,734 · HealthHEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER I…CENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES INC — $232,300 · HealthCENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVI…MINORITY AIDS SUPPORT SERVCES INC — $224,875 · HealthMINORITY AIDS SUPPORT SERVCES…HEALTH QUALITY INNOVATORS — $185,333 · HealthHEALTH QUALITY INNOVATORSTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC — $144,591 · HealthTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INCVA - CHW ASSOCIATION — $138,718 · HealthVA - CHW ASSOCIATIONVa Rural Health Association — $102,106 · Health+4 more — $130,604 · Health+4 moreCAPITAL CENTER OF VIRGINIA — $740,039 · Human ServicesCAPITAL CEN…TENNESSEE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ASSOCI — $40,000 · Human ServicesRHODE ISLAND PARENT INFORMATION NETWORK INC — $40,000 · Human Services+2 more — $21,390 · Human ServicesBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $500,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $14,000 · Food & NutritionSeniorNavigatorcom — $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $14,363 · Community ImprovementMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $11,250 · EducationSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $35,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,384,958Health$2,043,371Human Services$841,429Food & Nutrition$514,000Community Improvement$64,363Education$46,250Environment$40,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAPITAL CENTER OF VIRGINIA — $740,039 over 4y, 16% of budgetVIRGINIA HOSPITAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $707,592 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetPIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES INC — $634,110 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVIRGINIA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION — $542,717 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $500,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER INC — $250,734 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES INC — $232,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMINORITY AIDS SUPPORT SERVCES INC — $224,875 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $221,880 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetHEALTH QUALITY INNOVATORS — $185,333 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSACRED HEART CENTER INC — $180,443 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC — $144,591 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVA - CHW ASSOCIATION — $138,718 over 1y, 23% of budgetVa Rural Health Association — $102,106 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSeniorNavigatorcom — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTENNESSEE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ASSOCI — $40,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSOUTH LOUISVILLE COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRHODE ISLAND PARENT INFORMATION NETWORK INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC — $34,269 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetShabach Ministries Inc — $14,990 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $11,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW FUTURES — $6,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richmond Memorial Hea…Sentara HealthVirginia Health Care …Greater Washington Co…The Community Foundat…Annabella R Jenkins F…Delta Dental of Virgi…Direct ReliefTides FoundationNetwork for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…
Richmond Memorial Health FoundationVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Sentara Health · Virginia Health Care Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Annabella R Jenkins Foundation · Delta Dental of Virginia Foundation · Direct Relief · Tides Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Institute for Public Health Innovation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home