· Public charity
Institute for Humane Studies
The Institute discovers, develops, and supports students, scholars, and other intellectuals who maintain the highest standard of academic excellence and who share an interest in the principles of the classical liberal tradition.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 71 grants below total $1,758,569 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,224,873 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,466,304 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k53 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Rochester | $93,000 |
| George Mason University | $61,500 |
| Cairn University-Langhorne | $60,000 |
| Hillsdale College | $55,000 |
| Florida State University | $50,000 |
| Grove City College | $49,500 |
| Hampden-Sydney College | $48,500 |
| Washington College | $45,550 |
| Christopher Newport University | $45,000 |
| The Regents of the University of California - Berkley | $44,655 |
| University of Minnesota System | $43,340 |
| University of Arizona | $43,160 |
| Mercer University | $40,500 |
| Arizona State University | $37,825 |
| Northern Kentucky University | $36,560 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2025 · $218k · revenue +5%
DUKE UNIVERSITY2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +27%
The Florida State University Foundation Inc4× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +96%
Funded once
Cornell Universitygraduatedone grant, 2023 · $94k · revenue +27%
NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $87k · revenue +103%- UOUNIVERSITY OF WYOMINGone grant, 2024 · $58k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…
Education and Research
Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…
Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.
Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 73 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds University of New Orleans Foundation ↗
- Who funds CAIRN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Linfield University ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charles Koch Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Chemical Society · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · World Learning Inc · Ernst & Young Foundation · National Writing Project Corporation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · The Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles And · Council of Independent Colleges
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Institute for Humane Studies funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 26% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 25% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 12% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 11% of income from government
- Yale University — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 5% of income from government
- Linfield University — 4% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Assumption University — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 0% of income from government
- Washington College — 0% of income from government
- Ramapo College Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Ave Maria University Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Southern College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.