Skip to content
Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group at a glance

· Public charity

Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group

Isaca chapters' mission is to help individuals and enterprises achieve the positive potential of technology by being a local provider of isaca's body of knowledge, certification exam review, community, advocacy, and education on subjects such as information systems assurance and security, governance of enterprise of information…

$231k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$433kMembership Benefit$65kEmployment$54kYouth Development$10kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $102,832, the rows itemized in this filing. The $231,140 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $128,308 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,193
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Isaca Foundation$32,500
East Texas A&M University$22,247
University of Texas at Arlington$15,193
Collin College$12,892
Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta$10,000
Teach for America$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA STATE: $7k → 11%KODECONNECT INC: $6k → 8%SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%COASTLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%Cal Poly Pomona Philanthropic Foundation: $11k → 14%Teach for America: $10k → 17%Collin College: $11k → 5%University of North Texas: $31k → 8%University of Texas - Arlington: $15k → 11%Texas A&M Commerce: $24k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS ISACA STUDENT GROUP: $10k → 14%Texas A&M College of Business: $27k → 22%Foundation of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte: $25k → 10%Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta: $10k → 13%REGIS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%IT GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE: $6k → 14%Marymount University: $10k → 7%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%CAL POLY POMONA: $11k → 14%Collin County Community College District Foundation: $13k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $10k → 8%East Texas A&M University: $22k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS: $58k → 14%TEXAS A&M COLLEGE OF BUSINESS: $11k → 22%Code Your Dreams: $25k → 14%University of North Texas: $6k → 8%Isaca Foundation: $33k → 14%ISACA Foundation: $31k → 14%One In Tech an ISACA foundation: $26k → 14%One In Tech an ISACA Foundation: $18k → 14%ONE IN TECH: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$377k · 7 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$377k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

14%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    ISACA Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $117k · revenue +32%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH
    2× · 2017–2020 · $68k
  • TA
    Texas A&M University-Commerce
    3× · 2021–2024 · $60k

Funded once

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +98%
  • CO
    CODE OUR DREAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +165%
  • ET
    EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
2
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
5
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
9
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
10
Coast Community College District Foundation

The Coast Community College District Foundation was incorporated with the express purpose of promoting and assisting the education programs and projects of the Coast Community College District. The Coast Community District Foundation…

Education
11
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
12
Contra Costa College Foundation

To develop resources and relationships that provide financial support to contra costa college students through student scholarships, student programs and services, instructional supplies and facility improvements.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Code Our Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH: $67,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTHTexas A&M University-Commerce: $59,747 · OtherTexas A&M University-CommerceUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $47,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXASUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $31,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASUNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON: $30,193 · OtherUNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTONFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE: $25,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTEEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCOLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY: $23,892 · OtherCOLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY+4 more: $30,368 · Other+4 moreISACA Foundation: $117,250 · Community ImprovementISACA FoundationCODE OUR DREAMS: $25,000 · EducationCODE OUR DREAMSCOLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · EducationCOLLIN COUNTY COM…CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · EducationCAL POLY POMONA F…Teach for America Inc: $10,000 · EducationTeach for America…REGIS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITYCoastline Community College Foundation: $10,000 · EducationCoastline Communi…KODECONNECT INC: $6,061 · EducationKODECONNECT INCSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,960 · EducationSAN JOSE STATE UN…CAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$339,200Community Improvement$117,250Education$90,021Philanthropy$11,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISACA Foundation: $117,250 over 5y, 10% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoastline Community College Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKODECONNECT INC: $6,061 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,960 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kpmg US Foundation IncAssociation of Univer…Verizon FoundationTulsa Community Found…Communities Foundatio…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…
Kpmg US Foundation IncNJ15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc · Verizon Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home