· Public charity
Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group
Isaca chapters' mission is to help individuals and enterprises achieve the positive potential of technology by being a local provider of isaca's body of knowledge, certification exam review, community, advocacy, and education on subjects such as information systems assurance and security, governance of enterprise of information…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $102,832 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $231,140 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $128,308 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Isaca Foundation | $32,500 |
| East Texas A&M University | $22,247 |
| University of Texas at Arlington | $15,193 |
| Collin College | $12,892 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta | $10,000 |
| Teach for America | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFISACA Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $117k · revenue +32%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH2× · 2017–2020 · $68k
- TATexas A&M University-Commerce3× · 2021–2024 · $60k
Funded once
- FOFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +98%
- COCODE OUR DREAMSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +165%
- ETEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…
Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…
The Coast Community College District Foundation was incorporated with the express purpose of promoting and assisting the education programs and projects of the Coast Community College District. The Coast Community District Foundation…
The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…
To develop resources and relationships that provide financial support to contra costa college students through student scholarships, student programs and services, instructional supplies and facility improvements.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Code Our Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ISACA Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE ↗
- Who funds CODE OUR DREAMS ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY POMONA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Coastline Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KODECONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds IT GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc · Verizon Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc Group funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.