Skip to content
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$175kHealth$124kCommunity Improvement$100kHousing & Shelter$100kHuman Services$19kEducation$14kRecreation & Sports$13kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$793M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Family Promise of Hendricks County$100,000
Volunteers of America Ohio & Indiana$58,362
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Family Promise of Hendricks County: $100k → 5%Sheltering Wings: $19k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 3 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$394k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-6%

Still filing today

67%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $175k
  • KINGSWAY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $119k · revenue +59%
  • HC
    HENDRICKS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $100k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +18%
  • BO
    B & O TRAIL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +784%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Hendricks County

The primary mission of leadership hendricks county is to seek, prepare, involve and sustain leaders from diverse backgrounds to address community and countywide changes. developing quality leaders occurs in a signature program that takes…

Arts & Culture
2
United Way of Franklin County

To positively impact the lives of those in our community by assessing needs, uniting partner organizations, agencies, and volunteers, and devoting our financial resources and efforts to the most critical needs.

Philanthropy
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

—
6
Hancock-Hardin-Wyandot-Putnam Community Action Commission

To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…

—
7
Community Action of East Central Indiana

To provide education and assistance to low income, disadvantaged individuals and children.

Human Services
8
Bridges Community Services Inc

To develop, coordinate, and proivde housing, social services, and educational programs for low income and moderate income residents of muncie, indiana.

—
9
Hoosier Environmental Council Inc

Hoosier Environmental Council leads and collaborates with diverse coalitions to achieve a healthy natural environment and thriving sustainable communities.

Environment
10
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
11
Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana

To Develop and Provide resources for the purpose of assisting Low-Income Individuals through a variety of programs in Benton, Fountain, Montgomery, Parke, Vermillion, And Warren Counties in Indiana.

Human Services
12
Chamber of Commerce of Harrison County

Support our members and the business environment by fostering economic and community development initiatives to improve the quality of life in harrison county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hendricks County Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is B & O Trail Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA: $174,762 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANAHENDRICKS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $100,000 · OtherHENDRICKS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC+3 more: $18,000 · Other+3 moreKINGSWAY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC: $119,180 · HealthKINGSWAY COMMUNITY CARE…FAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF HENDR…SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERING WINGS CENTER…UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHENDRICKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyAVON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLA PLAZA INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyB & O TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $7,500 · Youth Development
Other$292,762Health$119,180Human Services$119,000Philanthropy$26,000Recreation & Sports$12,500Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKINGSWAY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC: $119,180 over 2y, 16% of budgetHENDRICKS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $100,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $19,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetB & O TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHENDRICKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrownsburg Education Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAVON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLA PLAZA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Central…Hendricks County Comm…Lincoln Legacy Founda…Central Indiana Commu…Duke Energy FoundationIndiana University He…Lilly Endowment IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…
United Way of Central Indiana IncIN23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Hendricks County Community Foundation Inc · Lincoln Legacy Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana University Health West Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home