Skip to content

· Public charity

Indiana Family Health Council Inc

The indiana family health council exists to advance health parity by facilitating, promoting, and advocating for all individuals, families, and communities regardless of ability to pay.

$6.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$38MHuman Services$6.8MEducation$427k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $483k
  • $250k+8 grants · $6.0M
$359,131
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION$1,725,913
PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION$1,035,740
NORTHERN INDIANA MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH NETWORKS$978,386
OPEN DOOR HEALTH SERVICES INC$634,048
HEALTHNET INC$611,897
MAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTERS$366,815
TRI-CAP$359,131
LAFAYETTE STREET FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC$317,388
NEW HOPE SERVICES INC$189,143
MONROE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$172,464
PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL$121,401
HEALTHLINC INC$47,144
IU HEALTH INC$38,817
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $253k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $1.0M → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $235k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $954k → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $233k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $943k → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $231k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $931k → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $193k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $888k → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $192k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $762k → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $192k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $646k → 15%NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $189k → 10%PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION: $625k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 17 repeat orgs$637k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$44M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+3469%

Still filing today

65%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +35%
  • NI
    Northern Indiana Maternal & Child Health Network
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +105% · 69% of their budget
  • OD
    Open Door Health Services Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CH
    CENTERSTONE HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $184k · revenue ×36
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Health Centers Inc

Improving the health status of the community at large with special emphasis on those who, because of their poverty, location in rural areas, or for other reasons, have health needs which are not being properly addressed.

Health
2
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
3
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
4
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
5
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
6
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
7
Indiana Health Information Exchange Inc

Through information exchange, we improve health and healthcare.

Health
8
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
9
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
10
Indiana Hospital Association Inc

The mission of indiana hospital association, inc. is to provide leadership, representation, and services in the common best interests of its members as they promote the improvement of community health status.

—
11
Indiana Primary Health Care Assoc Inc

To advocate for access to quality primary health care for all those uninsured and under insured residing in indiana and to support the growth and development of community-oriented primary care and population health initiatives.

Health
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc; the most unlike its peers is Open Door Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $11,691,159 · OtherHEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC: $3,543,394 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INCDUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP: $2,787,433 · OtherDUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAPIndiana University School of Medicine: $2,171,534 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineMONROE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $1,522,527 · OtherMONROE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTPUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL: $1,085,065 · Other+4 more: $1,133,299 · OtherNorthern Indiana Maternal & Child Health Network: $4,053,709 · HealthNorthern Indiana Maternal & Chi…Open Door Health Services Inc: $3,752,578 · HealthOpen Door Health Services IncHEALTHNET INC: $3,206,609 · HealthHEALTHNET INCNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $592,101 · Health+4 more: $773,136 · Health+4 morePACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,785,618 · Human ServicesPACE COMMUNITY ACTION…NEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $1,718,108 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE SERVICES INCINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $128,200 · Education
Other$23,934,411Health$12,378,133Human Services$8,503,726Education$128,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,785,618 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetNorthern Indiana Maternal & Child Health Network: $4,053,709 over 8y, 69% of budgetOpen Door Health Services Inc: $3,752,578 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC: $3,543,394 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetHEALTHNET INC: $3,206,609 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP: $2,787,433 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetNEW HOPE SERVICES INC: $1,718,108 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $592,101 over 4y, 16% of budgetMAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $366,815 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN: $330,827 over 5y, 14% of budgetSOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC: $219,320 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetCENTERSTONE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $184,172 over 1y, 25% of budgetREFRESH F5 INC: $146,061 over 4y, 15% of budgetHEALTHLINC INC: $47,144 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Health Inc: $38,817 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Northern Indiana Maternal & Child Health Network ↗
  • Who funds Open Door Health Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNET INC ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds REFRESH F5 INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHLINC INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Health Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Early Learning Indiana Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana Family Health Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana Family Health Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Indiana Family Health Council Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Indiana Family Health Council Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana Family Health Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph