· Public charity
Indiana Family Health Council Inc
The indiana family health council exists to advance health parity by facilitating, promoting, and advocating for all individuals, families, and communities regardless of ability to pay.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $86k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $483k
- $250k+8 grants · $6.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION | $1,725,913 |
| PACE - HEALTH CONNECTION | $1,035,740 |
| NORTHERN INDIANA MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH NETWORKS | $978,386 |
| OPEN DOOR HEALTH SERVICES INC | $634,048 |
| HEALTHNET INC | $611,897 |
| MAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTERS | $366,815 |
| TRI-CAP | $359,131 |
| LAFAYETTE STREET FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC | $317,388 |
| NEW HOPE SERVICES INC | $189,143 |
| MONROE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $172,464 |
| PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL | $121,401 |
| HEALTHLINC INC | $47,144 |
| IU HEALTH INC | $38,817 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +35%
- NINorthern Indiana Maternal & Child Health Network8× · 2017–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +105% · 69% of their budget
- ODOpen Door Health Services Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +76%
Funded once
- CHCENTERSTONE HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $184k · revenue ×36
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improving the health status of the community at large with special emphasis on those who, because of their poverty, location in rural areas, or for other reasons, have health needs which are not being properly addressed.
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.
Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
Through information exchange, we improve health and healthcare.
To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.
To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.
The mission of indiana hospital association, inc. is to provide leadership, representation, and services in the common best interests of its members as they promote the improvement of community health status.
To advocate for access to quality primary health care for all those uninsured and under insured residing in indiana and to support the growth and development of community-oriented primary care and population health initiatives.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc and the most unlike its peers is Open Door Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Indiana Maternal & Child Health Network ↗
- Who funds Open Door Health Services Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNET INC ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERSTONE HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds REFRESH F5 INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHLINC INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Health Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Early Learning Indiana Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indiana Family Health Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Indiana Family Health Council Inc?
Find your warmest path to Indiana Family Health Council Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.