Skip to content
Indiana AIDS Fund Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Indiana AIDS Fund Inc

The indiana aids fund, inc.

$457k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$7.9MCivil Rights$65kCommunity Improvement$62k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $424,734, the rows itemized in this filing. The $457,135 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,401 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $230k
$31,196
Median grant
2
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH$103,077
INDY PRIDE$65,000
AIDS MINISTRIES AIDS ASSIST$61,843
BU WELLNESS$48,580
STEP UP INC$32,848
NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION$31,196
ALIVENESS PROJECT OF NW INDIANA$24,652
MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES$22,798
ASPIRE INDIANA HEALTH$17,010
CLARK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$12,500
THE DAMIEN CENTER$5,230
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $246k → 12%AIDS RESOURCE GROUP OF EVANSVILLE: $37k → 15%MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES: $144k → 17%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $64k → 12%AIDS RESOURCE GROUP OF EVANSVILLE: $22k → 15%MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES: $60k → 17%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $64k → 12%AIDS RESOURCE GROUP OF EVANSVILLE: $20k → 15%MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES: $60k → 17%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $62k → 12%MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES: $45k → 17%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $31k → 12%MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES: $23k → 17%NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $28k → 12%HOOSIER HILLS AIDS COALITION: $5k → 10%HOOSIER HILLS AIDS COALITION: $5k → 10%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $135k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $126k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $81k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $80k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $60k → 16%THE DAMIEN CENTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 17 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$6.7M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+46%

Still filing today

82%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ALMOST4MINDS LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $687k · revenue +89% · 29% of their budget
  • BU
    BROTHERS UNITED INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $619k · revenue +180%
  • AT
    AIDS TASK FORCE OF LAPORTE & PORTER CO
    6× · 2019–2024 · $618k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AI
    Aspire Indiana Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $358k · revenue +46%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HOOSIERS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $358k · revenue -73%
  • DC
    DAMIEN CARESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
3
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
5
Indiana University Health Arnett Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Morgan Inc
—
11
Indiana University Health Blackford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspire Indiana Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALMOST4MINDS LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATION: $686,544 · HealthALMOST4MINDS LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATIONBROTHERS UNITED INC: $618,916 · HealthBROTHERS UNITED INCAspire Indiana Health Inc: $545,593 · HealthAspire Indiana Health IncAspire Indiana Inc: $358,341 · HealthAspire Indiana IncHEALTHY HOOSIERS FOUNDATION INC: $357,667 · HealthHEALTHY HOOSIERS FOUNDATION INCSTEP-UP INCORPORATED: $168,945 · HealthSTEP-UP INCORPORATEDDAMIEN CARES: $150,000 · Health+6 more: $77,243 · HealthAIDS TASK FORCE OF LAPORTE & PORTER CO: $617,615 · OtherAIDS TASK FORCE OF LAPORTE …REFRESH F5 INC: $464,977 · OtherREFRESH F5 INCCLARK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $416,256 · OtherCLARK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM…HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $190,175 · OtherHEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORA…COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC: $103,015 · OtherTHE HEALTH FOUNDATION OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC: $101,000 · Other+3 more: $45,750 · OtherNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $494,724 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST INDIANA P…THE DAMIEN CENTER: $487,423 · Human ServicesTHE DAMIEN CENTERMATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES FOUNDATION: $331,294 · Human ServicesMATTHEW 25 AIDS SER…AIDS RESOURCE GROUP INC: $79,429 · Human ServicesAIDS RESOURCE GROUP…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesIndiana University Research & Technology Corporation: $717,540 · EducationIndiana Un…AIDS MINISTRIES-AIDS ASSIST OF NORTH INDIANA INC: $559,490 · Civil RightsIndy Pride Inc: $265,000 · Recreation & SportsBLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $141,555 · PhilanthropySCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $62,100 · Community Improvement
Health$2,963,249Other$1,938,788Human Services$1,402,870Education$717,540Civil Rights$559,490Recreation & Sports$265,000Philanthropy$141,555Community Improvement$62,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Research & Technology Corporation: $717,540 over 4y, 36% of budgetALMOST4MINDS LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATION: $686,544 over 4y, 29% of budgetBROTHERS UNITED INC: $618,916 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetAIDS TASK FORCE OF LAPORTE & PORTER CO: $617,615 over 6y, 20% of budgetAIDS MINISTRIES-AIDS ASSIST OF NORTH INDIANA INC: $559,490 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetAspire Indiana Health Inc: $545,593 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $494,724 over 6y, 16% of budgetTHE DAMIEN CENTER: $487,423 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetREFRESH F5 INC: $464,977 over 4y, 75% of budgetAspire Indiana Inc: $358,341 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTHY HOOSIERS FOUNDATION INC: $357,667 over 1y, 15% of budgetMATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES FOUNDATION: $331,294 over 5y, 100% of budgetIndy Pride Inc: $265,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSTEP-UP INCORPORATED: $168,945 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetBLOOMINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $141,555 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE HEALTH FOUNDATION OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC: $101,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAIDS RESOURCE GROUP INC: $79,429 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $62,100 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $16,405 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $15,421 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Health Inc: $14,767 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL AIDS DIRECTORSDBA NASTAD: $12,107 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPathway to Recovery Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetIndiana University Health Bloomington Inc: $8,543 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Health Foundation…Lilly Endowment IncRichard M Fairbanks F…United Way of Central…The Indianapolis Foun…Central Indiana Commu…Maurer Family Foundat…Broadway Caresequity …Second Helpings IncNicholas H Noyes Jr M…For the Girls IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…
The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis IncIN41.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Health Foundation of Greater Indianapolis Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · Second Helpings Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · For the Girls Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana AIDS Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana AIDS Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Indiana AIDS Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Indiana AIDS Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana AIDS’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home