Skip to content
In Him Resources Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

In Him Resources Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$214k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$617kArts & Culture$123kInternational$78kHealth$47kHuman Services$40kPhilanthropy$18kYouth Development$11kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRECEPT MINISTRIES$29,000
AMG INTERNATIONAL$23,600
PARABLE$20,600
ANTECESSOR$18,500
CMA$18,100
HOPE UNLIMITED$8,600
HOPE & HELP INTERNATIONAL$8,200
MINISTRY ESSENTIALS$7,600
SIM USA$7,600
WMBW$5,000
STREET2STREET$3,600
ABWE$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,600
CENTRAL CLEARING HOUSE$3,600
INTERNATIONAL BIBLICAL TRAINING$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $3k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $3k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $3k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $3k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
KS
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$847k · 36 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
11

Total granted

$847k
$194k

Still filing today

39%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AMG INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $62k · revenue +23%
  • HA
    HOPE AND HELP INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +77%
  • S2
    STREET 2 STREET
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • BH
    BRAINERD HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • WP
    WOODLAND PARK BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • GI
    GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prepare Ministries Inc

At Prepare our goal is to prepare every saint to meet the Lord on His day of appearing. To stand before Him with no regret. We seek to raise up an authentic witness of Jesus on earth. We seek to do this through supporting church planters,…

Religion
2
Puzzle Piece Ministries

To deliver the message of Jesus

Religion
3
Tmm Ministries Inc

The mission of TMM Ministries is to influence people for Jesus Christ. This is accomplished by conducting camps retreats and training sessions for children youth and adults at Cumberland Springs Bible Camp where the gospel of Jesus Christ…

Recreation & Sports
4
Pathfinders Ministries
Religion
5
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
6
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
7
Pacific Island Ministries

To help fulfill the great commission as found in Matthew 28:19-20, the equipping of God's people for works of service, particularly in Papua New Guinea.

International
8
CrossTraining Ministry of Pilot Mountain
Religion
9
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
10
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
11
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
12
Transform Ministries
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amg International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prison Prevention Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRAINERD HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherBRAINERD HILLS BAPTIST CHURCHCMA: $72,100 · OtherCMAIndividual grant recipient: $49,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE UNLIMITED: $47,000 · OtherHOPE UNLIMITEDMINISTRY ESSENTIALS: $36,000 · OtherANTECESSOR: $25,500 · OtherWOODLAND PARK BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · OtherWMBW: $25,000 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATED: $24,200 · Other+28 more: $271,100 · Other+28 morePrecept: $140,000 · ReligionPreceptHOPE AND HELP INTERNATIONAL: $53,500 · ReligionHOPE AND HELP INTERNATIONA…STREET 2 STREET: $19,500 · ReligionSTREET 2 STREETPursue Ministries: $12,000 · ReligionCROSSROADS OF EAST TENNESSEE: $12,000 · ReligionSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,000 · Religion+1 more: $4,800 · ReligionAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $62,400 · InternationalFORGOTTEN CHILD FUND INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesBethel Bible Village: $12,500 · Human ServicesPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE: $12,500 · EducationCHATTANOOGA RESCUE MISSION: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterPrison Prevention Ministries Inc: $6,000 · Crime & LegalON POINT: $3,000 · Health
Other$700,100Religion$250,800International$62,400Human Services$27,500Education$12,500Housing & Shelter$7,500Crime & Legal$6,000Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrecept: $140,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $62,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE AND HELP INTERNATIONAL: $53,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSTREET 2 STREET: $19,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFORGOTTEN CHILD FUND INC: $15,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBethel Bible Village: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPursue Ministries: $12,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCROSSROADS OF EAST TENNESSEE: $12,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHATTANOOGA RESCUE MISSION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPrison Prevention Ministries Inc: $6,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEvery Man A Warrior Inc: $4,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetON POINT: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Precept ↗
  • Who funds AMG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AND HELP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds STREET 2 STREET ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN CHILD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Bethel Bible Village ↗
  • Who funds Pursue Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF EAST TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds SCORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian…Weldon F Osborne Foun…Robert L & Kathrina H…The Maclellan Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Servant FoundationRaymond James Charita…Renaissance Charitabl…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…
Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN33.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In Him Resources Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In Him Resources Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on In Him Resources’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home