Skip to content
Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$190kEnvironment$100kHuman Services$98kHealth$42kCivil Rights$35kFood & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$15kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA NATURAL RESOURCE FOUNDATION$100,000
THE WALORSKI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC$47,186
NURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$10,000
SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC$6,000
GUIDANCE MINISTRIES INC$5,000
HEART CITY HEALTH CENTER INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTE$5,000
HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC$3,500
INTERNATIONAL SOCCER ACADEMY OF AME$2,500
HUGS PROJECT OF ELKHART COUNTY IN$2,000
KANES AUTO SERVICE$521
HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC$357
GREENCROFT RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES$357
VA NORTHERN INDIANA HEALTH CARE$331
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FREMONT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY OUTREAC: $15k → 9%BELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTE: $5k → 13%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $6k → 12%BELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTE: $5k → 13%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $5k → 12%VOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INC: $30k → 12%HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC: $4k → 13%HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 67%.

Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministrieslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 30% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 9 repeat orgs$427k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$99k
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

56%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +20%
  • BV
    BELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +77%
  • HG
    HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CS
    Casa Shalom Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -53% · 50% of their budget
  • LT
    LIGHT TO ISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -20%
  • VO
    VOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
2
Liberty Womens Clinic

Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.

Health
3
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
4
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
5
Life Choices Resource Center Inc

To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.

—
6
Life Resources of Northern Michigan Inc

Provide crisis pregnancy services

Human Services
7
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
8
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
9
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
10
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
11
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
12
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Mission of Elkhart Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dismas House of Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Casa Shalom Ministries Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesCasa Shalom Ministries IncVOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesVOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INCFREMONT YOUTH & COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $15,000 · Human ServicesFREMONT YOUTH & COMMUNITY OUTREACHSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INCBELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER …HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC: $7,000 · Human Services+1 more: $357 · Human ServicesINDIANA NATURAL RESOURCE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherINDIANA NATURAL RESOURCE FOUNDATIONGUIDANCE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · OtherGUIDANCE MINISTRIES INCRIGHT TO LIFE OF NORTH CENTRAL IN: $10,000 · OtherRIGHT TO LIFE OF NORTH CENTRAL INNURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 · OtherNURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIPGLOBAL CONNECTORS INC: $6,200 · Other+11 more: $33,709 · Other+11 morePROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTD: $35,000 · ReligionPROVIDENT MINISTR…LIGHT TO ISRAEL INC: $30,000 · ReligionLIGHT TO ISRAEL I…Gymtown Pantry Inc: $15,000 · ReligionGymtown Pantry In…Walorski Family Foundation Inc: $47,186 · PhilanthropyWalorski F…ALLEN COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC: $25,000 · HealthHeart City Health Center Inc: $10,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionVoices for Life Inc: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$173,357Other$169,909Religion$80,000Philanthropy$47,186Health$40,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa Shalom Ministries Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetWalorski Family Foundation Inc: $47,186 over 1y, 78% of budgetPROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTD: $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLIGHT TO ISRAEL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetVOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetALLEN COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetFREMONT YOUTH & COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetGymtown Pantry Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeart City Health Center Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetHELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetVoices for Life Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetRIGHT TO LIFE MICHIANA EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEVILLE LIONS CLUB INC: $2,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFAITH MISSION OF ELKHART INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISMAS HOUSE OF INDIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREENCROFT RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC: $357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHubbard Hill Estates Inc: $357 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Renaissance Charitabl…Natl Christian Charit…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Elkhart County IncIN21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries?

    Find your warmest path to Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home