· Private foundation
Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA NATURAL RESOURCE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE WALORSKI FAMILY FOUNDATION INC | $47,186 |
| NURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP | $10,000 |
| SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC | $6,000 |
| BELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTE | $5,000 |
| GUIDANCE MINISTRIES INC | $5,000 |
| HEART CITY HEALTH CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC | $3,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL SOCCER ACADEMY OF AME | $2,500 |
| HUGS PROJECT OF ELKHART COUNTY IN | $2,000 |
| KANES AUTO SERVICE | $521 |
| HUBBARD HILL ESTATES INC | $357 |
| GREENCROFT RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES | $357 |
| VA NORTHERN INDIANA HEALTH CARE | $331 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 67% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +20%
- BVBELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +77%
- HGHELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- CSCasa Shalom Ministries Incone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -53% · 50% of their budget
- LTLIGHT TO ISRAEL INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -20%
- VOVOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.
Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.
Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…
To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.
Provide crisis pregnancy services
Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.
To provide support for pregnant women
Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.
The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Mission of Elkhart Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dismas House of Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Casa Shalom Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Walorski Family Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTD ↗
- Who funds LIGHT TO ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF JUDAH ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEN COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Gymtown Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds FREMONT YOUTH & COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC ↗
- Who funds Heart City Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds BELLA VITA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds RIGHT TO LIFE MICHIANA EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Voices for Life Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKEVILLE LIONS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH MISSION OF ELKHART INC ↗
- Who funds DISMAS HOUSE OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds GREENCROFT RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Hubbard Hill Estates Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries?
Find your warmest path to Impact International Inc Dba Im- Pact International Inc Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.