Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Impact Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$781kEducation$150kYouth Development$122kInternational$40kHuman Services$17kHealth$12kHousing & Shelter$9kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALVARY CHURCH$53,000
BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY$40,000
THE NORTH CHURCH$20,000
READ MINISTRIES$15,000
MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE$13,000
YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES$13,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TEN20 WORDS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
PIONEERS$4,000
HEALING HAITI$3,000
EQUIPNET INTERNATIONAL$3,000
CRU$2,500
WORLD RELIEF WISCONSIN$2,000
SHEPARDS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED FELLOWSHIP WORSHIP CENTER: $10k → 6%SHEPARDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%YOUNG LIFE MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%TEN20 WORDS: $8k → 14%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $52k → 8%READ MINISTRIES: $65k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $55k → 14%YOUNG LIFE EAST CENTER: $27k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $53k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $25k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $40k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $40k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES: $26k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $14k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $13k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES: $13k → 14%READ MINISTRIES: $15k → 7%CALVARY CHURCH: $11k → 14%YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES: $9k → 14%YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES: $9k → 14%YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES: $8k → 14%YOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES: $8k → 14%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $15k → 11%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $13k → 11%THE NORTH CHURCH: $40k → 14%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $12k → 11%THE NORTH CHURCH: $20k → 14%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $12k → 11%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $12k → 11%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $12k → 11%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $11k → 11%MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $11k → 11%BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $40k → 11%BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH: $33k → 11%HOPE UNITED CDC: $10k → 11%BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $27k → 11%BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $27k → 11%BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $20k → 11%BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $20k → 11%BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH: $20k → 11%BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH: $20k → 11%BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH: $19k → 11%BETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY: $16k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
PA
CA
CO
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Impact Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 73% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Impact Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 31 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+25%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    READ MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +158%
  • MF
    MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $97k · revenue +92%
  • E
    EQUIPNET
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +272%

Funded once

  • TL
    Training Leaders Internationalgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • JR
    JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • GP
    GARFIELD PRISON CHAPLAIN MINISTRY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
5
Frontline Missions International

Fmi works among people in areas of war, persecution, and poverty, primarily in restricted-access countries, seeking to strengthen the church, give voice to persecuted christians, and preach and publish the gospel.

Religion
6
Equip Ministries International

Equip ministries trains overseas pastors and leaders, empowers the church, provides humanitarian aid, and attempts to reach the unreached peoples around the world by working with church leaders to fulfil

Religion
7
Russian Leadership Ministries

Prepare pastoral and congregational leaders of churches to impact russia with the gospel of jesus christ

Philanthropy
8
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
9
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
10
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

11
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
12
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Garfield Prison Chaplain Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALVARY CHURCH — $226,000 · OtherCALVARY CHURCHBETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARY — $149,680 · OtherBETHLEHEM COLLEGE & SEMINARYMINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE — $96,750 · OtherMINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTEBETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH — $91,521 · OtherBETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCHYOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIES — $78,100 · OtherYOUNG LIFE NORTHERN TWIN CITIESNORTH CHURCH — $60,000 · OtherNORTH CHURCHFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $58,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHYOUNG LIFE EAST CENTER — $38,000 · Other+16 more — $171,465 · Other+16 moreREAD MINISTRIES INC — $180,000 · ReligionREAD MINISTRIES INCEQUIPNET — $20,000 · ReligionEQUIPNETTHE SHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION — $14,000 · ReligionTHE SHEPHERD'S FOUND…+3 more — $2,700 · ReligionHEALING HAITI — $15,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $4,500 · InternationalMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $12,000 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE REEL HOPE PROJECT — $2,200 · Youth Development
Other$969,516Religion$216,700International$19,500Health$12,000Youth Development$10,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREAD MINISTRIES INC — $180,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetMINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE — $96,750 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetEQUIPNET — $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING HAITI — $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARRIVE MINISTRIES — $14,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION — $14,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REEL HOPE PROJECT — $2,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTraining Leaders International — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds READ MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MINNESOTA FAMILY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds EQUIPNET
  • Who funds HEALING HAITI
  • Who funds ARRIVE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds THE REEL HOPE PROJECT
  • Who funds Training Leaders International
  • Who funds GARFIELD PRISON CHAPLAIN MINISTRY
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph