· Public charity
Illinois Public Health Institute
IPHI mobilizes stakeholders, catalyzes partnerships and leads action to improve public health systems to maximize health, health equity and quality of life for people and communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k32 grants · $913k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Wisconsin Food Hub Cooperative | $74,373 |
| Beyond Green Sustainable Food Partners | $61,328 |
| Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin | $49,570 |
| Madison Consolidated Schools | $46,259 |
| Hundred Acre LLC | $44,739 |
| Rooted School Indy | $41,243 |
| KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $41,194 |
| Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System | $41,182 |
| Northeast Wisconsin Hmong Professionals | $38,976 |
| Greater Wabash Food Council | $34,392 |
| Rooted WI Inc | $27,446 |
| FoodRight Inc | $27,247 |
| Global Philanthropy Partnership | $25,286 |
| Beds Plus Care inc | $25,000 |
| Phoenix Community Development Services | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $284k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASaint Anthony Hospital2× · 2021–2022 · $113k · revenue +5%
- CFCENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION2× · 2021–2022 · $87k · revenue +54%
- GSGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2022 · $85k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUTone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -31%
- TMThe Miriam Hospital Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +55%
- AHARIZONA HOUSING COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +494%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Heartland alliance health's mission is to transform healthcare for the most vulnerable, particularly people experiencing homelessness, mental illness or addictions, or struggling with multiple chronic illnesses, improving health for all…
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ginnfarms Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Saint Anthony Hospital ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUT ↗
- Who funds The Miriam Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CTDATA COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HEALTH INFORMATION INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Friend Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Human Resources Development Institute Inc - Southwood ↗
- Who funds ROOTED SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ROSELAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Illinois Primary Health Care Association ↗
- Who funds Northeast Wisconsin Hmong Profes ↗
- Who funds SEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GINNFARMS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIES IN CARING INC ↗
- Who funds O LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds ROOTED WI INC ↗
- Who funds FOODRIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds HARLEM UNITED COMMUNITY AIDS CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: All Chicago Making Homelessness History · Circle of Service Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Housing Action Illinois · AIDS Foundation of Chicago · Greater Chicago Food Depository · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Illinois Public Health Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Bay State Community Services Inc — 76% of income from government
- O League — 49% of income from government
- Ctdata Collaborative — 35% of income from government
- Salem County Inter Agency Council of Human Services Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Allies in Caring Inc — 20% of income from government
- United Way of Central Jersey Inc — 3% of income from government
- Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Howard County General Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Illinois Public Health Institute?
Find your warmest path to Illinois Public Health Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.