Skip to content

· Public charity

Illinois Policy Institute

The institute is a free market oriented think tank dedicated to gathering, disseminating, and educating illinois constituents on local, state, and federal public policy issues facing illinois.

$705k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$700k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Illinois Policy Institute’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Bradley Impact Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
1
’18
2
’19
2
’20
1
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$10MPublic Benefit$1.3MEducation$425kCrime & Legal$248kSocial Science$211kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRADLEY IMPACT FUND$700,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $2.7M → 17%FRANKLIN CENTER FOR GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $721k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $1.5M → 9%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $995k → 17%FRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION: $595k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $1.4M → 9%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $700k → 17%THINK FREELY MEDIA: $425k → 14%DONOR'S TRUST: $1.3M → 9%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $500k → 17%LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $185k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $960k → 9%LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $20k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $526k → 9%CHICAGO CLASSIC ACADEMY: $7k → 14%TALENT MARKET: $5k → 9%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA: $4k → 14%GAUDY AND JOY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%AMERICAN CULTURE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA: $5k → 14%LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 14%PROJECT SIX: $204k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 82% of Illinois Policy Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 50%.

Illinois Policy Institutelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 3 repeat orgs$661k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +420% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$648k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+420%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Public BenefitEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FN
    FRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.3M · revenue +420% · 52% of their budget
  • LJ
    LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER
    3× · 2017–2020 · $235k · revenue +797% · 27% of their budget
  • AI
    AMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA
    2× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • TF
    THINK FREELY MEDIA
    one grant, 2017 · $425k · revenue -98% · 26% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMMON SENSE IN SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $204k · revenue +40%
  • CC
    CHICAGO CLASSIC ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Antitrust Institute Inc

Promote competition that protects consumers, businesses, and society.

Social Science
2
American Media Institute

Inform the public by providing news

—
3
American Commitment

Further the common good and general welfare of the citizens of the united states of america by educating the public about free market economies and related public policies.

—
4
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
5
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
6
Media Matters for America

Dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the u.s. media.

Education
7
Trusting News Inc

Trusting News improves the quality of news reporting by studying trust in news and training and coaching journalists to demonstrate credibility and actively earn trust. Their work equips thousands of journalists every year to better…

Arts & Culture
8
Illinois Policy Institute

The institute is a free market oriented think tank dedicated to gathering, disseminating, and educating illinois constituents on local, state, and federal public policy issues facing illinois.

Public Benefit
9
Future Tech Insights Inc

The organization provides public education on artificial intelligence.

Public Benefit
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Center for the National Interest

The center is a non-partisan public policy institution established by former president richard nixon. its current programs focus on energy, security, climate change and u.s. relations with china, japan, russia and the middle east.

Public Benefit
12
Americans for Public Trust

The Organization's mission is to restore trust in government by holding officials and groups accountable for corrupt and unethical behavior through investigation, legal action, and reporting.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin News Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Think Freely Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Donors Trust Inc: $5,598,511 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust IncBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $4,895,000 · PhilanthropyBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INCFRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION: $1,315,667 · EducationFRANKLIN NEWS F…THINK FREELY MEDIA: $425,000 · EducationTHINK FREELY ME…LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $235,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR COMMON SENSE IN SCIENCE: $204,053 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CULTURE FOUNDATION: $13,194 · Public BenefitAMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA: $8,500 · Public BenefitCHICAGO CLASSIC ACADEMY: $7,115 · OtherGAUDY AND JOY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6,576 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other
Philanthropy$10,493,511Education$1,740,667Crime & Legal$235,000Public Benefit$225,747Other$18,691

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDonors Trust Inc: $5,598,511 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $4,895,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetFRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION: $1,315,667 over 2y, 52% of budgetTHINK FREELY MEDIA: $425,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetLIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $235,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMON SENSE IN SCIENCE: $204,053 over 1y, 23% of budgetAMERICAN CULTURE FOUNDATION: $13,194 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Policy Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Policy Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Policy Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph