Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Illinois Policy Institute

The institute is a free market oriented think tank dedicated to gathering, disseminating, and educating illinois constituents on local, state, and federal public policy issues facing illinois.

$705k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$700k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Illinois Policy Institute’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Bradley Impact Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
17
1
18
2
19
2
20
1
21
0
22
0
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$10MPublic Benefit$1.3MEducation$425kCrime & Legal$248kSocial Science$211kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$700,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRADLEY IMPACT FUND$700,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $2.7M → 17%FRANKLIN CENTER FOR GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $721k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $1.5M → 9%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $995k → 17%FRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION: $595k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $1.4M → 9%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $700k → 17%THINK FREELY MEDIA: $425k → 14%DONOR'S TRUST: $1.3M → 9%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $500k → 17%LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $185k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $960k → 9%LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $20k → 14%DONORS TRUST: $526k → 9%CHICAGO CLASSIC ACADEMY: $7k → 14%TALENT MARKET: $5k → 9%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA: $4k → 14%GAUDY AND JOY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%AMERICAN CULTURE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA: $5k → 14%LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 14%PROJECT SIX: $204k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 82% of Illinois Policy Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 50% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Illinois Policy Institutelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 3 repeat orgs$661k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +318% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$648k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+318%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Public BenefitEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FN
    FRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.3M · revenue +318% · 52% of their budget
  • LJ
    LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER
    3× · 2017–2020 · $235k · revenue +361% · 27% of their budget
  • AI
    AMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA
    2× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • TF
    THINK FREELY MEDIA
    one grant, 2017 · $425k · revenue -98% · 26% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMMON SENSE IN SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $204k · revenue +40%
  • CC
    CHICAGO CLASSIC ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Antitrust Institute Inc

Promote competition that protects consumers, businesses, and society.

Social Science
2
American Media Institute

Inform the public by providing news

3
American Commitment

Further the common good and general welfare of the citizens of the united states of america by educating the public about free market economies and related public policies.

4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Future Tech Insights Inc

The organization provides public education on artificial intelligence.

Public Benefit
8
Illinois Policy Institute

The institute is a free market oriented think tank dedicated to gathering, disseminating, and educating illinois constituents on local, state, and federal public policy issues facing illinois.

Public Benefit
9
Media Matters for America

Dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the u.s. media.

Education
10
Center for the National Interest

The center is a non-partisan public policy institution established by former president richard nixon. its current programs focus on energy, security, climate change and u.s. relations with china, japan, russia and the middle east.

Public Benefit
11
Americans for Public Trust

The Organization's mission is to restore trust in government by holding officials and groups accountable for corrupt and unethical behavior through investigation, legal action, and reporting.

Arts & Culture
12
Newseum Inc

The newseum educates the public about the value of a free press in a free society and tells the stories of the world's important events in unique and engaging ways.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin News Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Think Freely Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Donors Trust Inc — $5,598,511 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust IncBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC — $4,895,000 · PhilanthropyBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INCFRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION — $1,315,667 · EducationFRANKLIN NEWS F…THINK FREELY MEDIA — $425,000 · EducationTHINK FREELY ME…LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER — $235,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR COMMON SENSE IN SCIENCE — $204,053 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CULTURE FOUNDATION — $13,194 · Public BenefitAMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA — $8,500 · Public BenefitCHICAGO CLASSIC ACADEMY — $7,115 · OtherGAUDY AND JOY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $6,576 · OtherTALENT MARKET — $5,000 · Other
Philanthropy$10,493,511Education$1,740,667Crime & Legal$235,000Public Benefit$225,747Other$18,691

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDonors Trust Inc — $5,598,511 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC — $4,895,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetFRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION — $1,315,667 over 2y, 52% of budgetTHINK FREELY MEDIA — $425,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetLIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER — $235,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMON SENSE IN SCIENCE — $204,053 over 1y, 23% of budgetAMERICAN CULTURE FOUNDATION — $13,194 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDEPENDENT MEDIA — $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Illinois Policy Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph