Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iiwii Foundation (F/K/A the Brooke-McCarragher Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$9.8MEducation$298kInternational$229kEnvironment$44kReligion$38kRecreation & Sports$26kSocial Science$20kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$972k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURE EARTH$25,375
BUXTON SCHOOL$10,000
CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$3,000
UNITED STATES COURT TENNIS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$2,500
TUXEDO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES BUREAU INC: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MT
NY
MA
WY
PA
NJ
RI
CA
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 21 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$10M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+32%

Still filing today

43%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BLACKSMITH INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $226k · revenue ×11
  • BS
    BUXTON SCHOOLINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +2%
  • Appalachian Mountain Club
    3× · 2017–2019 · $34k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +5%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PURPLE HEART HONOR SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
4
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
5
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
9
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
10
The American Institute of Architects

Vision: drive positive change through the power of design and focused activism.mission: aia inspires and empowers architects to improve society and transform the world.

—
11
The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations

The mission of the new york public library is to inspire lifelong learning, advance knowledge, and strengthen our communities.

Education
12
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blacksmith Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverside Choral Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE DAF: $9,775,333 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE DAF+25 more: $183,811 · OtherBUXTON SCHOOLINC: $190,252 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $15,500 · EducationTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $15,000 · EducationDUBLIN SCHOOL INC: $10,540 · Education+4 more: $13,000 · EducationBLACKSMITH INSTITUTE INC: $226,478 · InternationalAppalachian Mountain Club: $34,000 · Environment+2 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES COURT TENNIS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsNew York-New Jersey Trail Conference Inc: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities Bureau Inc: $250 · Human ServicesVOICES OF ASCENSION INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureRIVERSIDE CHORAL SOCIETY: $300 · Arts & Culture
Other$9,959,144Education$244,292International$226,478Environment$36,000Recreation & Sports$24,500Human Services$5,250Arts & Culture$2,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACKSMITH INSTITUTE INC: $226,478 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetBUXTON SCHOOLINC: $190,252 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $34,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUBLIN SCHOOL INC: $10,540 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES COURT TENNIS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York-New Jersey Trail Conference Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TUXEDO PARK LIBRARY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTUXEDO PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTUXEDO PARK LIBRARY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLATHEAD LAND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE CHORAL SOCIETY: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Bureau Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACKSMITH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BUXTON SCHOOLINC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds DUBLIN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds VOICES OF ASCENSION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES COURT TENNIS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds New York-New Jersey Trail Conference Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TUXEDO PARK LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds TUXEDO PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds TUXEDO PARK LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD LAND TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iiwii Foundation (F/K/A the Brooke-McCarragher Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iiwii Foundation (F/K/A the Brooke-McCarragher Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities Bureau Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Iiwii Foundation (F/K/A the Brooke-McCarragher’s filings →

More from the funding graph