Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ihs Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2021
20
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$17M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Ihs Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to American Endowment Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Ihs Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $18M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
’17
8
’18
10
’19
9
’20
7
’21
1
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$19MPhilanthropy$17MEducation$3.0MHealth$1.4MArts & Culture$604kAnimals$551kInternational$35kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2021 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $764k
  • $250k+3 grants · $17M
$55,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IHS Fund AEF$16,754,926
Wisconsin Luth College$377,725
Martin Luther College$296,395
Gigi's Dog Shelter$119,111
Opera Project Columbus$70,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
Ebenezer Ethiopian Evangelical Church$55,000
Zion Lutheran Church$55,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
Prince of Peace Church$55,000
Shriners Hospital for Children$50,000
Billy Graham Evangelistic Association$50,000
Tunnel to Towers Fund$50,000
St Jude Research Hospital$50,000
WELS KINGDOM WORKERS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $50 → 11%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITITES: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 35 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2021, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
46

Total granted

$6.6M
$743k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+17%

Still filing today

17%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    OPERA PROJECT COLUMBUS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $594k · revenue +22% · 67% of their budget
  • WE
    WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $241k · revenue +118%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2017–2021 · $51k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY VETERINARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $380k
  • WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $157k · revenue +33%
  • CH
    COLUMBUS HUMANEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +121%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
4
Mercy for Animals Inc

Mercy for animals' mission is to construct a compassionate food system that is not just kind to animals but essential for the future of our planet and all who share it. our vision of a world where animals are respected, protected, and free…

Animals
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
8
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
9
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IHS Fund AEF: $16,754,926 · OtherIHS Fund AEFWisconsin Luth College: $1,060,900 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $988,320 · OtherOH State Univ Medical: $936,506 · Other+63 more: $3,460,025 · Other+63 moreAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $16,567,604 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+1 more: $241,000 · PhilanthropyOPERA PROJECT COLUMBUS INC: $593,863 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC: $241,000 · ReligionGIGI'S SHELTER FOR DOGS: $119,111 · AnimalsCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $50,000 · Animals+3 more: $1,400 · AnimalsSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $51,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $23,500 · Health+4 more: $1,850 · HealthFRIENDS NETWORK: $16,000 · InternationalHands Together Inc: $15,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $2,000 · International+5 more: $2,800 · International
Other$23,200,677Philanthropy$16,808,604Arts & Culture$593,863Religion$241,000Animals$170,511Health$76,350International$35,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $16,567,604 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOPERA PROJECT COLUMBUS INC: $593,863 over 5y, 67% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $241,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC: $241,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $156,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIGI'S SHELTER FOR DOGS: $119,111 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $51,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHands Together Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABLELIGHT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILL NECK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPEAK FOR THE UNSPOKEN: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PROJECT COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIGI'S SHELTER FOR DOGS ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Fred C Rutz Foundation · Holzhueter Foundation · Neumann Family Foundation Inc · Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ihs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ihs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ihs Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ihs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ihs’ filings →

More from the funding graph