Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fred C Rutz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$337kEducation$133kHealth$31kPhilanthropy$13kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$887k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR EV LUTHERAN CHURCH$12,000
NMDP FOUNDATION$10,000
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$9,500
MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE$9,000
ST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,500
TRUTH IN LOVE MINISTRIES$4,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY$3,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY$2,500
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN CHAPEL$2,000
LUTHERAN MINISTRIES MEDIA INC$2,000
TIME OF GRACE$2,000
NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS' HOSPITAL$2,000
OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION$1,000
ABLELIGHT FOUNDATION INC$500
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ERNESTINES DAUGHTER NFP: $500 → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $1k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $1k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 8%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 8%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 8%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NV
IN
OH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$506k · 22 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$506k
$2k

Still filing today

23%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +33%
  • OL
    OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +8%
  • WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • CT
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY - WALTER A MAIER SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
2
Our Lady of Mercy Life Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. our lady of mercy life center is a member of st. peter's health…

3
Apostolic Christian Lifepoints Inc

Provide facilities and care for the developmentally disabled

Human Services
4
Able Inc

A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…

Human Services
5
Christian Life Resources Inc

The mission of christian life resources is to use life and family issues as bridges to convey the love of god and to share the message of salvation through christ. this organization educates people on what god's word has to say about the…

Religion
6
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
7
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
8
Wellspire Llc

Guided by christian compassion, wellspire supports the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home.

9
Ohio Living Communities

See schedule oohio living communities was founded in 1922 and was incorporated as an ohio non-profit corporation in 1959. the corporation's mission statement is as follows:our mission is to provide older adults with caring and quality…

Human Services
10
Westminster Village Inc

We help people live their lives to the fullest thru the provision of a comprehensive continuum of programs and services. regardless of whether a resident is in independent living, assisted living, memory care, or skilled nursing care, our…

Human Services
11
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Women Doing Well Inc

Women doing well exists to activate women towards greater purposeful generosity. this is accomplished by taking women through the women doing well pathway where they will learn their purpose, identify their passions, and create a plan to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ablelight Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dreamcatcher Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH — $132,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCHMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE — $67,500 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGEIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH — $59,500 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHWISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY — $46,500 · OtherWISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARYST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCH — $26,000 · OtherST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCHWISCONSIN LUTHERAN CHAPEL — $19,000 · OtherTRUTH IN LOVE MINISTRIES — $17,500 · OtherMICHIGAN LUTHERAN SEMINARY — $17,000 · Other+11 more — $80,100 · Other+11 moreOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION — $13,000 · Human ServicesABLELIGHT INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesDreamcatcher Foundation Inc — $4,500 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesTIME OF GRACE MINISTRY — $19,000 · ReligionNMDP FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyABLELIGHT FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Health
Other$465,100Human Services$24,500Religion$19,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIME OF GRACE MINISTRY — $19,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetABLELIGHT INC — $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDreamcatcher Foundation Inc — $4,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY
  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ABLELIGHT INC
  • Who funds Dreamcatcher Foundation Inc
  • Who funds WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds ABLELIGHT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ERNESTINES DAUGHTER NFP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI21.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Neumann Family Foundation Inc · Ihs Foundation · Holzhueter Foundation · Robert a and Lynn I Doneff Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred C Rutz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred C Rutz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred C Rutz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph