How much did NEUMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of NEUMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

expendituresmilwaukeesaviorlutheran church

2023

expendituresevangelical lutheransaviorhopechurch

2024

milwaukeeministrieslutherangracefolds honor

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $40k
$10k–50k13 grants · $145k
$50k–250k3 grants · $150k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

AMERICAN MAJORITY INC$50,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC$50,000
WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND (VERITAS SOCIETY)$50,000
MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC$15,000
CHAPLAINS IN SCHOOLS INC$15,000
FOLDS OF HONOR WISCONSIN CHAPTER INC (FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION)$15,000
LIFECAMPUSA INC$10,000
SCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN INC$10,000
GRACE IN ACTION$10,000
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$10,000
TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY$10,000
LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC$10,000
LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC$10,000
WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE$10,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$405k · 12 repeat orgs$590k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$405k

$385k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

+8%

Still filing today

58%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationReligionYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +32%
CI
CHAPLAINS IN SCHOOLS INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +267%
LY
LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +65%

Funded once

WR
WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND
one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +18%
WR
WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -17%
LH
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Wisconsin Right to Life Foundation Inc

To support pro-life organizations.

Education

Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries

To provide healthcare for the elderly.

—

Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—

Wisconsin Independent Christian School

Pursue educational excellence through christ centered programs.

Education

Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod

Providing support and training for various mission and outreach ministry needs and opportunities.

Religion

Lutheran Counseling and Family Services

Lutheran counseling and family services of wisconsin provides faith-based mental health counseling, family life education and adoption services.

Human Services

Lifeways of Wisconsin Inc

Operation of childcare centers based on the waldorf teaching method. nurturing children, families, caregivers and communities. lifeways welcomes children and families of any race, religion,

Human Services

Luther House of Study

Strengthening lutheran leadership and ministries.

Education

Lakeside Lutheran Foundation Inc

Provide ongoing financial support to lakeside lutheran high school of lake mills, wi, and its students

Education

Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin

Provider of health and human services.

Human Services

Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty

The organization shall advance the rule of law, free markets and a robust civic culture through litigation, research, public education, and the provision of legal counsel to like minded individuals and organizations.

Crime & Legal

Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wels Lutherans for Life Metro Milwaukee and the most unlike its peers is Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/34

the rest of the field

869/9,373

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

25/25

Grantees still filing

20/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$675,000Education$110,000Religion$60,000Public Benefit$50,000Youth Development$40,000Health$35,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Siebert Lutheran Foundation IncWI26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Theodore W Batterman · Stimac Family Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Church Mutual Insurance Company · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Green Bay Packers Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEUMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 391150264 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Neumann Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Neumann Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEUMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neumann Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

NEUMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neumann Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph