Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ignatius Ohno Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$933k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$499k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MInternational$274kHousing & Shelter$176kEducation$134kPhilanthropy$124kHealth$98kCivil Rights$89kHuman Services$87kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $390k
  • $250k+1 grant · $499k
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jesuits Northwest Province$499,000
Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest$45,000
Spiritual Exercises in Everyday Lif$25,000
Intercommunity Peace Justice Center$20,000
Mary's Place Seattle$20,000
Maryknoll Fathers Brothers$20,000
Matthew 25 Ministries$20,000
Maryknoll Sisters$20,000
Cristo Rey Jesuit Seattle$20,000
Orion - Youthcare$20,000
Doctors Without Borders$20,000
Massachusetts Eye Ear Curing Kids F$20,000
Maryknoll Missionaries$20,000
World Central Kitchen$20,000
Operation Nightwatch$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Just Projects International: $5k → 4%Just Projects International: $40k → 14%Mary's Place Seattle: $20k → 9%Shared Hope International: $1k → 9%Just Projects International: $5k → 4%Just Projects International: $5k → 14%Shared Hope International: $1k → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $10k → 9%Shared Hope International: $1k → 9%Shared Hope International: $750 → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $8k → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $6k → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $4k → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $2k → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $2k → 9%Mary's Place Seattle: $2k → 9%Home of Hope Ministries: $40k → 9%Home of Hope Ministries: $10k → 9%Home of Hope Ministries: $5k → 9%Home of Hope Ministries: $5k → 9%Home of Hope Ministries: $5k → 9%Bellevue Lifespring: $2k → 9%Bellevue Lifespring: $1k → 9%Bellevue Lifespring: $500 → 9%Bellevue Lifespring: $500 → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $5k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $2k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $2k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $2k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $2k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $2k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $2k → 9%Youthcare: $8k → 9%Youthcare: $4k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $1k → 9%Youthcare: $2k → 9%Youthcare: $2k → 9%Youthcare: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 82% of Ignatius Ohno Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 6%.

Ignatius Ohno Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 45 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
6

Total granted

$2.7M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+49%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JV
    JESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +5%
  • IP
    INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +64%
  • PJ
    PHILIPPINE JESUIT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • JU
    Jesuits USA UCA Nicaragua Emergency
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SU
    SEATTLE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +138%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
5
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
6
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
7
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
8
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
9
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
10
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
11
Living Water International

Living Water International ("Living Water") exists to demonstrate the love of God by helping communities in 17 developing countries acquire desperately needed clean water and to experience "living water" - the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Human Services
12
Justice and Mercy International

From the amazon jungle to eastern europe, our work is locally implemented through our indigenous staff on the ground. in moldova, we prioritize caring for vulnerable children and teens who are at risk of human trafficking. in the amazon,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jesuits Northwest Province: $1,124,000 · OtherJesuits Northwest ProvinceJesuits West: $220,000 · OtherJesuits WestSeattle Prep School: $109,999 · OtherINTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER: $88,500 · OtherMassachusetts Eye Ear Curing Kids F: $87,500 · OtherSpiritual Exercises in Everyday Lif: $72,000 · Other+27 more: $394,250 · Other+27 moreOPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC: $104,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION NI…HOME OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $65,000 · Human ServicesHOME OF HOPE…JUST PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 · Human ServicesJUST PROJECT…MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $54,000 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE…YOUTHCARE: $18,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARECHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $18,000 · Human ServicesCHIEF SEATTL…+2 more: $11,250 · Human ServicesPHILIPPINE JESUIT FOUNDATION: $67,500 · InternationalPHILIPPINE…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $45,000 · InternationalFEED MY ST…Matthew 25 Ministries Inc: $27,500 · InternationalMatthew 25…Compassion International Incorporated: $23,000 · InternationalCompassion…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $17,500 · InternationalWATER MISS…CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $12,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $12,000 · International+4 more: $18,500 · International+4 moreJESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST: $98,500 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · ReligionInternational Christian Mission Services: $10,000 · ReligionMARKET PROJECT INC: $16,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES OF ROOTED BRILLIANCE: $9,000 · Education
Other$2,096,249Human Services$325,250International$263,000Philanthropy$98,500Religion$50,000Community Improvement$16,000Education$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC: $104,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetJESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST: $98,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetINTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER: $88,500 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetPHILIPPINE JESUIT FOUNDATION: $67,500 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetHOME OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $65,000 over 5y, 41% of budgetJUST PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $54,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $18,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARKET PROJECT INC: $16,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Christian Mission Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES OF ROOTED BRILLIANCE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $7,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Jesuits International Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAP International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Women in Need: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKiran Anjali Project: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JESUIT VOLUNTEER CORPS NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PHILIPPINE JESUIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds JUST PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MARKET PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Christian Mission Services ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES OF ROOTED BRILLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Seattle Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ignatius Ohno Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ignatius Ohno Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ignatius Ohno’s filings →

More from the funding graph