Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ign Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$440k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.3MEducation$857kCrime & Legal$385kHousing & Shelter$281kHealth$204kYouth Development$190kReligion$105kPhilanthropy$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$100,000
MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT$75,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DELAWARE$40,000
SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY$30,000
T&E CARE$20,000
MERCY CAREER AND TECHNICAL HIGH SCH$20,000
A BABYS BREATH$20,000
MOTHERS HOME$20,000
NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY$10,000
FIRST STATE SCHOOL$10,000
PKD FOUNDATION$10,000
ST PHILIP NERI$10,000
GWYNEDD MERCY ACADEMY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ST DENIS CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%A BABYS BREATH: $75k → 7%PROJECT SWEET PEAS: $10k → 7%A BABYS BREATH: $60k → 7%MOTHERS HOME: $60k → 10%A BABYS BREATH: $60k → 7%MOTHERS HOME: $30k → 10%A BABYS BREATH: $20k → 7%MOTHERS HOME: $30k → 10%A BABYS BREATH: $20k → 7%MOTHERS HOME: $30k → 10%A BABYS BREATH: $15k → 7%MOTHERS HOME: $30k → 10%A BABYS BREATH: $10k → 7%MOTHERS HOME: $20k → 10%MOTHERS HOME: $20k → 10%KENDALLS CRUSADE: $5k → 6%AMIGOS DE JESUS: $10k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $13k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $75k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $75k → 7%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $75k → 7%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $60k → 7%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $60k → 7%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $25k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJ: $20k → 7%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $20k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $15k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJ: $10k → 7%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $15k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $15k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJ: $10k → 7%FACE TO FACE: $25k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 22%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
PA
NJ
CT
RI
MO
VA
DE
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 32 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
17

Total granted

$3.5M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+21%

Still filing today

53%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT
    8× · 2018–2025 · $385k · revenue +62%
  • AB
    A Babys Breath
    7× · 2019–2025 · $260k · revenue +95%
  • MH
    MOTHERS' HOME
    7× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • FT
    FACE TO FACE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -25%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
2
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
3
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
4
Mary's Shelter

Mary's shelter is committed to empowering homeless youth by providing housing, education, and social service programs.

Human Services
5
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
6
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
7
Princeton Healthcare System a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of princeton healthcare system is to provide exceptional, compassionate care to enhance the health and wellness of our patients, their families, and our community. princeton healthcare system provides inpatient and outpatient…

Health
8
Bethesda Children's Home

Bethesda's vision is to fulfill the social, emotional, spiritual, and behavioral health needs of children, families, and individuals by providing an effective and efficient continuum of care in a quality focused environment.

Human Services
9
The Children's Home of Pittsburgh

The children's home of pittsburgh, established in 1893, is an independent, non-profit licensed organization whose purpose is to promote the health and well-being of infants and children through services which establish and strengthen the…

Health
10
Turning Points for Children

To nurture families with children who are struggling against economic and environmental odds, giving them the critical resources, life skills and supportive partnerships to create stronger families and raise children with hope for a…

Human Services
11
St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc

To ensure that those impacted by poverty have the skills and resources to achieve their full potential.

Human Services
12
My Sisters' Place Inc

My sisters place is committed to ending homelessness by empowering women, families, and others in greater hartford to achieve independence and stability in their community by providing housing and supportive services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Neighborhood Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $501,900 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY CENTER AT VISITATION: $420,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CENTER AT VISITATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC: $173,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INCIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientT&E CARE: $108,833 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherST PATRICK'S CENTER INC: $80,000 · OtherPKD Foundation: $70,000 · Other+25 more: $473,650 · Other+25 moreMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $385,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECTA Babys Breath: $260,000 · Human ServicesA Babys BreathMOTHERS' HOME: $220,000 · Human ServicesMOTHERS' HOMENORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesNORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INCMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INCLAUREL HOUSE: $70,000 · Human ServicesLAUREL HOUSE+5 more: $68,333 · Human Services+5 moreLA SALLE ACADEMY: $135,000 · EducationTHILLEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · EducationSAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC: $160,000 · Housing & ShelterBLESSED SARNELLI COMMUNITYINC: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterRADNOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST: $18,334 · EnvironmentCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $15,000 · ReligionSave The Children Federation Inc: $7,995 · International
Other$2,077,383Human Services$1,208,333Education$190,000Housing & Shelter$182,500Philanthropy$20,000Environment$18,334Religion$15,000International$7,995

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $385,000 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetA Babys Breath: $260,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetMOTHERS' HOME: $220,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC: $173,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC: $160,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetLA SALLE ACADEMY: $135,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INC: $115,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetST PATRICK'S CENTER INC: $80,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPKD Foundation: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE: $70,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMERLIN'S KIDS INC: $35,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTHILLEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetFACE TO FACE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLESSED SARNELLI COMMUNITYINC: $22,500 over 2y, 33% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $20,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADNOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST: $18,334 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $18,333 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos de Jesus: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetProject Sweet Peas: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $7,995 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENDALL'S CRUSADE: $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDERS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds A Babys Breath ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS' HOME ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MERLIN'S KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THILLEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSED SARNELLI COMMUNITYINC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds RADNOR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Amigos de Jesus ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connelly FoundationPA21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Patriarch Family Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools · The Philadelphia Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ign Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ign Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ign Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ign Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ign’s filings →

More from the funding graph