Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ian and Marsha Gardenswartz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$63kHealth$20kInternational$16kHuman Services$9kPhilanthropy$8kEducation$6kRecreation & Sports$500Civil Rights$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,360
Median grant
4
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COLORADO$10,000
DENVER KEHILLAH$5,440
SLOAN KETTERING$5,000
BMH$4,550
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$4,000
MIZEL INSTITUTE$2,500
DARKHEI NOAM$2,000
JEWISH NEVADA$1,800
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY$1,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,500
SHALOM PARK$1,360
DENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$1,040
SCROLL K$893
ADATH SHALOM$810
YJP LAS VEGAS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHALOM PARK: $2k → 8%SHALOM PARK: $1k → 8%SHALOM PARK: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 12 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$60k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+8%

Still filing today

58%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • SP
    SHALOM PARK
    3× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +20%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    3× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • VB
    VALLEY BETH SHALOM
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Denver Academy of Torah

Denver academy of torah (the "school")provides education to students from kindergarten through high school. the school's mission is to nuture students to be torah-observant role models and future leaders through an intellectually rigorous…

Education
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
Congregation Har Shalom

Har Shalom is an active center of Jewish learning and worship serving all of Northern Colorado. We are intentionally non-denominational and egalitarian, serving a wide diversity of spiritual paths. Our synagogue membership of 200+ families…

Religion
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Jewish Federation of El Paso and Las Cruces

Serving the jewish community by engaging, connecting, supporting and celebrating jewish life, values and culture in el paso, las cruces, israel and beyond.

—
9
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
10
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
The Jewish Federation of Nwi Inc

Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is JEWISHColorado; the most unlike its peers is Darchei Noam Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DENVER KEHILLAH: $13,030 · OtherDENVER KEHILLAHBMH: $9,760 · OtherBMHSLOAN KETTERING: $5,000 · OtherSLOAN KETTERINGMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $5,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGRODEF SHALOM: $4,000 · OtherRODEF SHALOMJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERVALLEY BETH SHALOM: $3,800 · OtherVALLEY BETH SHALOMJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER: $3,600 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $3,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $2,500 · Other+16 more: $9,618 · Other+16 moreJEWISHColorado: $28,762 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColoradoDARCHEI NOAM INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyDARCHEI NOAM INCJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $8,600 · InternationalLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $3,860 · EducationDENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $2,080 · EducationSHALOM PARK: $4,160 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $500 · Human ServicesESHEL: $3,480 · ReligionETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $180 · Religion
Other$63,908Philanthropy$32,762International$8,600Arts & Culture$7,500Education$5,940Human Services$4,660Religion$3,660

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISHColorado: $28,762 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $8,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHALOM PARK: $4,160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDARCHEI NOAM INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $3,860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESHEL: $3,480 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $2,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM PARK ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI NOAM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ESHEL ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Jewish Communal Fund · The Strear Family Foundation Inc · Shana Glassman Foundation · The Chotin Family Foundation · JEWISHColorado · Rose Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ian and Marsha Gardenswartz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ian and Marsha Gardenswartz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ian and Marsha Gardenswartz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ian and Marsha Gardenswartz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ian and Marsha Gardenswartz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph