Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iaga International Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$105kHealth$10kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$2kCivil Rights$1kInternational$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kYouth Development$958Other$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$443
Median grant
7
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE SOBER LIVING$8,136
JOYNER MINISTRIES$1,438
OUR RESCUE$1,100
FLIPCAUSE$885
DEATH 2 LIFE REVOLUTION$860
YOUNG LIFE$800
MUSTARD SEED RANCH$670
THE NAVIGATORS$600
GLOBAL CELEBRATION$443
NEW PROMISE CHIRSTIAN FELLOWSHIP$316
YWAM$250
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$250
WOMEN FOR FAMILIES & FREEDOM$250
BEYOND FEAR TO FREEDOM$250
CHURCH ON THE STREET$205
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $5k → 19%MUSTARD SEED RANCH: $670 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
NE
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 12 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$101k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-11%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
ReligionHealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    Grace Sober Living
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +49%
  • MS
    MUSTARD SEED RANCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +4%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $958 · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • NL
    NEW LIFE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue -21%
  • AC
    ARCADIA CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • F
    FINISTERRE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
2
Gospel Lifeline Ministries

The mission is to train and equip leaders. To help all believers reach their full potential and divine destiny, that they may become all that God has called them to be.

Religion
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
One Life Ministries
Religion
5
Lx Ministries Inc

Our mission is to multiply the global impact and influence of Christian leaders and pastors throughout their organizations and communities. Our activities involve working with members of the leadership of other exclusively charitable…

Religion
6
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
7
Word of Life Fellowship Inc

The purpose of Word of Life Fellowship is evangelization and discipleship through various means consistent with the Holy Scriptures to help build and strengthen the Church of Jesus Christ. Ministries include camps and conferences, youth…

Religion
8
New Life Global Ministries Inc

Religious education, training and mission

Religion
9
Explore God Network
—
10
Worklife Inc

To collaborate with God to empower people to practice an effective life at work.

Religion
11
T4 Global Inc

Spokens Mission is Deliver Truth...Where Written Words Cant Go. Most missiologists will agree that 2/3 of the world is populated with oral learners. Among this population, a person learns best by listening and interacting with stories,…

Human Services
12
A Jesus Mission

A Jesus Mission creates unique opportunities for individuals or teams to serves as Christian missionaires around the world through traditional evangelism, discipleship training, and outreach.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW PROMISE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $78,390 · OtherNEW PROMISE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP+18 more: $11,353 · Other+18 moreNEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $19,000 · ReligionNEW LIFE MINISTRIE…Global Celebration: $849 · Religion+2 more: $1,000 · ReligionGrace Sober Living: $9,285 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthMUSTARD SEED RANCH: $5,670 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE: $1,100 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIFE: $958 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICA'S WOMEN: $250 · Community Improvement
Other$89,743Religion$20,849Health$9,535Human Services$5,670Arts & Culture$1,100Youth Development$958Community Improvement$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $19,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGrace Sober Living: $9,285 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMUSTARD SEED RANCH: $5,670 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $958 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Celebration: $849 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND FEAR TO FREEDOM: $761 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOne Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION LIGHTFORCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S WOMEN: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Grace Sober Living ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED RANCH ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Global Celebration ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND FEAR TO FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds One Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION LIGHTFORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iaga International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iaga International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iaga International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Iaga International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iaga International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph