Skip to content

· Private foundation

I J Feldman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$440kEducation$147kArts & Culture$71kHealth$69kReligion$25kYouth Development$13kFood & Nutrition$6kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$637k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE ISRAEL FUND$13,200
THE KEEP CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$2,000
WESTERN THEATER COMPANY$1,500
ADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION$1,500
MISCELLANEOUS - VARIOUS DONATIONS$1,245
BONE HEALTH & OSTEOPEROSIS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 9%SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JCC: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218k · 25 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
56

Total granted

$218k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+22%

Still filing today

32%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +119%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    3× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • BM
    BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • AS
    APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +19%
  • AA
    AN APPALACHIAN SUMMER FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $424,933 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+4 more: $24,843 · Philanthropy+4 moreAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $38,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE ISRAEL FUND: $30,800 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL FUNDAPPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOU: $14,550 · Other+54 more: $123,745 · Other+54 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE ARTS INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $9,500 · Arts & CultureBRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ HOUSE KIDS INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureTHE KEEP CONSERVATION FOUNDATION LTD: $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $8,500 · EducationCARLTHORP SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD: $750 · EducationPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION: $500 · EducationORGANIZATION OF BLACK AEROSPACE PROFESSIONALS: $500 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF MORSELIFE INC: $1,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $500 · Health+4 more: $1,000 · HealthSILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $150 · Human Services
Philanthropy$449,776Other$332,195Arts & Culture$39,000Youth Development$16,500Education$13,450Health$11,500Human Services$2,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $424,933 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE ARTS INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KEEP CONSERVATION FOUNDATION LTD: $16,500 over 6y, 18% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $11,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJAZZ HOUSE KIDS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLTHORP SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADIRONDACK CENTER FOR LOON CONSERVATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Lace Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MORSELIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION OF BLACK AEROSPACE PROFESSIONALS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KEEP CONSERVATION FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ HOUSE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARLTHORP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SILVERLAKE INDEPENDENT JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tides Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I J Feldman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I J Feldman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Jazz House Kids Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Museum & Art Centerinc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on I J Feldman’s filings →

More from the funding graph