Skip to content
I & G Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

I & G Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$119k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$9.3MHuman Services$613kHousing & Shelter$544kHealth$454kEmployment$307kCrime & Legal$300kEducation$260kCivil Rights$250kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$118,586
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IGRB FOUNDATION JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$118,586
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $416k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OLINGA LEARNING: $55k → 12%CHILD FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%SISTER SONG INC: $1k → 13%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $10k → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $10k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $10k → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 14%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $48k → 12%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $2k → 14%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $48k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $43k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 12%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
KS
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 57 repeat orgs$7.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +81% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 56 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
56

Total granted

$4.8M
$7.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+81%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH
    4× · 2017–2020 · $200k · revenue +405%
  • AC
    ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $187k · revenue +639%
  • TT
    THE THRESHOLDS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $178k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • IF
    IGRB FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7.2M · revenue ×317
  • OL
    OLINGA LEARNINGgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $55k · revenue +48%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO UTEP
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
5
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
8
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
9
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
12
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/104
Grantees still filing
89/104
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IGRB FOUNDATION: $7,206,287 · PhilanthropyIGRB FOUNDATION+3 more: $386,560 · PhilanthropyIGRB FOUNDATION JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $1,638,673 · OtherIGRB FOUNDATION JEWISH FEDERAT…NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $230,000 · OtherNORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS FOUNDATI…THE THRESHOLDS: $178,000 · OtherIllinois Action for Children: $167,965 · OtherTHE ARK: $160,255 · OtherPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $142,000 · OtherSt Leonard's Ministries: $140,370 · Other+66 more: $803,080 · Other+66 moreFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $168,000 · Human ServicesAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $140,000 · Human ServicesOLINGA LEARNING: $55,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $30,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $15,000 · Human Services+6 more: $21,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH: $200,000 · Crime & LegalMake the Road New York: $50,000 · Crime & LegalJAMES B MORAN CENTER FOR YOUTH ADVOCACY: $42,000 · Crime & LegalZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $32,000 · Crime & LegalAmerican Gateways: $12,000 · Crime & Legal+4 more: $14,000 · Crime & LegalThe Cara Program: $163,620 · EmploymentNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $105,500 · EmploymentCURT'S CAFE: $25,000 · Employment+1 more: $10,000 · EmploymentALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $187,000 · Housing & ShelterALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $52,000 · Housing & ShelterURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterAssociation for Waldorf Education in San Diego: $82,000 · EducationPROJECT SYNCERE: $55,000 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationBOOKS AND BREAKFAST: $30,000 · EducationTHE GRAY MATTER EXPERIENCE INC: $20,000 · EducationCOHERENT DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $15,000 · Education+5 more: $13,750 · Education
Philanthropy$7,592,847Other$3,460,343Human Services$429,000Crime & Legal$350,000Employment$304,120Housing & Shelter$261,500Education$255,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $237,560 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH: $200,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $187,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $178,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $168,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetIllinois Action for Children: $167,965 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cara Program: $163,620 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $142,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $140,370 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $137,500 over 4y, 92% of budgetCENTRO ROMERO: $108,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $105,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHICAGO HOUSE & SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $102,480 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAssociation for Waldorf Education in San Diego: $82,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetOLINGA LEARNING: $55,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $52,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMake the Road New York: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJAMES B MORAN CENTER FOR YOUTH ADVOCACY: $42,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetProject Open Hand: $40,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS AND BREAKFAST: $30,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $29,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GRAY MATTER EXPERIENCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO INDUSTRIAL ARTS AND DESIGN CENTER NFP: $20,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAND STEWARDSHIP PROJECT: $18,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOHERENT DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetMINNESOTA INDIAN WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMAN UTILITY: $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Gateways: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMONA FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRefugee & Immigrant Transitions: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROWHAUS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Igrb FoundationPolk Bros Foundation …The Chicago Community…Circle of Service Fou…United Way of Metropo…Chicago Foundation fo…Arie and Ida Crown Me…Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Yelp FoundationVivo FoundationWayfarer FoundationRobert R McCormick Fo…
Igrb FoundationIL45.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Igrb Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Chicago Foundation for Women · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Vivo Foundation · Wayfarer Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I & G Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I & G Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to I & G Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to I & G Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on I & G’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home