Skip to content
I & B Neuman Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

I & B Neuman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$781
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$37kReligion$29kArts & Culture$23kPhilanthropy$9kRecreation & Sports$4kInternational$2kCivil Rights$1kHealth$375Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$500
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$200
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$45
US HOLUCAUST MUSEUM$36
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $385) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $250 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 17 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
32

Total granted

$58k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+50%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • ZC
    ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +38%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF UTAH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • HT
    HADOR THE HEBREW ANNUAL OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -85% · 26% of their budget
  • CO
    CHABAD OF SOUTHERN VERMONT
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
10
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
11
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Warwick Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
28/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF UTAH INC: $12,680 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF UTAH INCSAJ: $7,950 · OtherSAJCHABAD OF SOUTHERN VERMONT: $3,000 · OtherCHABAD OF SOUTHERN VERMONTUCLA: $3,000 · OtherUCLACHABAD LUBAVITCH OF PARK CITY: $2,860 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF PARK CITYWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $2,500 · OtherWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC+26 more: $6,884 · Other+26 moreZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION …American Museum of Natural History: $4,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natur…HADOR THE HEBREW ANNUAL OF AMERICA: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHADOR THE HEBREW ANNUAL …+4 more: $845 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEB…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,650 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUND…+1 more: $75 · InternationalTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES …Horace Mann School: $2,000 · EducationHorace Mann S…+4 more: $400 · EducationUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $4,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,250 · Civil RightsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$38,874Arts & Culture$22,845International$21,725Education$12,900Philanthropy$8,000Civil Rights$1,250Recreation & Sports$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHADOR THE HEBREW ANNUAL OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHorace Mann School: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL HILLEL: $720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $310 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH CORPORATIONS OF AMERICA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE HILLEL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN OUTREACH PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEERFIELD VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew York Historical Society: $235 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $215 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $135 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE TOWN OF WARWICK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT WISNER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWarwick Fire Department: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC): $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARWICK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundWilbur G Malcolm Foun…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY18.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Wilbur G Malcolm Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I & B Neuman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I & B Neuman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc): 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on I & B Neuman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home