Skip to content

· Public charity

Hyde Park Art Center

The purpose of the HYDE PARK ART CENTER (the art center) is to stimulate and sustain the visual arts in chicago.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$616k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $72,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $104,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO$8,000
TERRAIN EXHIBITIONS$8,000
JUPITER MAGAZINE LLC$8,000
LMRM LLC$8,000
VILLARTE CHICAGO$8,000
TALA GALLERY LLC$8,000
THE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO$8,000
AGNES FOUNDATION OF THE ARTS INC$8,000
INGA BOOKS LLC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%FRACTURED ATLAS: $8k → 9%TIGER STRIKES ASTEROID INC: $8k → 20%TALAMANTES LLC: $8k → 14%ROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO: $8k → 14%TALA GALLERY LLC: $8k → 14%TIGER STRIKES ASTEROID: $8k → 14%PRESS HERE: $12k → 14%LIBERATED ARTS MOVEMENT: $8k → 14%TRQPITECA LLC: $8k → 14%ART CENTER OF ENGLEWOOD INC: $8k → 14%ROME IN A DAY NFP: $12k → 14%AGUILAR ALBERTO: $8k → 14%ROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO: $8k → 14%INGA BOOKS LLC: $8k → 14%THE BEAT BANK: $8k → 14%SPRANGLER PHILIP: $8k → 14%VGA FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%TERRAIN EXHIBITIONS: $8k → 14%WAGNER ANNA: $8k → 14%COMFORT STATION NFP: $8k → 14%AXIS LAB: $8k → 14%THE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%EXPERIMENTAL SOUND STUDIOS: $8k → 14%CHRISTIE MILO: $8k → 14%HEAVEN GALLERY: $8k → 14%DOCUMENT LLC: $8k → 14%JUCAS BRIAN: $8k → 14%VILLARTE CHICAGO: $8k → 14%IN CARE OF BLACK WOMEN LLC: $12k → 14%BRIDGE ART NFP: $8k → 14%NARROW BRIDGE ART CLUB: $12k → 14%LMRM LLC: $8k → 14%BRIDGE ART NFP: $8k → 14%IN CARE OF BLACK WOMEN: $8k → 14%GRAHAM CENTRAL STATIONLLC: $8k → 14%MARIMACHA MONARCA PRESS LLC: $12k → 14%TERRAIN EXHIBITIONS: $8k → 14%FOLDED MAP PROJECTS: $8k → 14%TERRAIN EXHIBITIONS: $8k → 14%SWEET WATER FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%INGA BOOKS LLC: $12k → 14%PUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE: $8k → 14%ANIMATE STUDIO LLC: $12k → 14%ROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%ROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%SPACESHIFT COLLECTIVE LLC: $12k → 14%COMPOUND YELLOW: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 14 repeat orgs$412k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
44

Total granted

$276k
$372k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+31%

Still filing today

29%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    ROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION NFP
    2× · 2021–2023 · $36k · revenue +303%
  • RI
    ROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO
    3× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +480%
  • TE
    TERRAIN EXHIBITIONS
    3× · 2021–2025 · $24k

Funded once

  • NB
    NARROW BRIDGE ART CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • MM
    MARIMACHA MONARCA PRESS LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • SC
    SPACESHIFT COLLECTIVE LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Space Arts

Open Space Arts is a Chicago-based nonprofit dedicated to producing bold LGBTQ-focused theater and presenting independent queer cinema. The organization supports emerging and established artists while engaging audiences through live…

Arts & Culture
2
Equity Arts

EQUITY ARTS is a center for the creative economy that advances racial equity and wealth-building for artists and entrepreneurs. This reparative ownership model preserves space for synergistic exchanges between value-aligned partners. The…

—
3
Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Pullman Arts

Bringing together arts and culture on Chicago's far south side. Everyone deserves access to art, and creators should be treated like family.

Arts & Culture
5
Howl Arts Inc
Arts & Culture
6
Match Works Corp

Match Works provides financial support to Chicago visual artists to support the production of new artwork.

Arts & Culture
7
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Aggregate Space Gallery

ASG is an exhibition and performance space dedicated to the exploration and presentation of immersive works. We provide extensive in-house resources and expertise that enable artists to promote intellectual and tangible artworks in a…

—
9
New Art Association
Arts & Culture
10
The Art Complex Inc
—
11
The Florence Center for Contemporary Music
Arts & Culture
12
Studio At 550

Provided arts programming including performances and artist support.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is DFBRL8R Ltd #101; the most unlike its peers is Narrow Bridge Art Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TERRAIN EXHIBITIONS: $24,000 · OtherINGA BOOKS LLC: $20,000 · OtherCOMPOUND YELLOW: $20,000 · OtherIN CARE OF BLACK WOMEN LLC: $20,000 · OtherAGAPE WERKS INC: $16,000 · OtherAMFM STUDIOS LLC: $16,000 · OtherAPPARATUS PROJECTS: $16,000 · OtherAGNES FOUNDATION OF THE ARTS INC: $16,000 · OtherTRQPITECA LLC: $16,000 · Other+35 more: $296,000 · Other+35 moreROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION NFP: $36,000 · Arts & CultureROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION NFPROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO: $28,000 · Arts & CultureROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGOBRIDGE NFP: $16,000 · Arts & CultureBRIDGE NFPVGA Foundation: $16,000 · Arts & CultureVGA FoundationPUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE: $16,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTENARROW BRIDGE ART CLUB: $12,000 · Arts & CultureNARROW BRIDGE ART CLUBALT SPACE CHICAGO: $8,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Art Department: $8,000 · Arts & CultureDFBRL8R LTD #101: $8,000 · Arts & CultureHEAVEN GALLERY: $8,000 · Arts & CultureExperimental Sound Studio: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCOMFORT STATION NFP: $8,000 · Arts & CultureROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ARTCENTER: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTIGER STRIKES ASTEROID INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureThe Artists Cooperative Residency and Exhibitions: $8,000 · Arts & CultureSweet Water Foundation Inc: $8,000 · Food & NutritionOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyFOLDED MAP PROJECT: $8,000 · Civil Rights
Other$460,000Arts & Culture$204,000Food & Nutrition$8,000Philanthropy$8,000Civil Rights$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION NFP: $36,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO: $28,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetVGA Foundation: $16,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE: $16,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetALT SPACE CHICAGO: $8,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetChicago Art Department: $8,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHEAVEN GALLERY: $8,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSweet Water Foundation Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExperimental Sound Studio: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOLDED MAP PROJECT: $8,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOMFORT STATION NFP: $8,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWEDGE PROJECTS: $8,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetZEPHYR DANCE ENSEMBLE: $8,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetROOTS & CULTURE CONTEMPORARY ARTCENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTIGER STRIKES ASTEROID INC: $8,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Artists Cooperative Residency and Exhibitions: $8,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROMAN SUSAN ART FOUNDATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds ROME IN A DAY PRODUCTIONS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE NFP ↗
  • Who funds VGA Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NARROW BRIDGE ART CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ALT SPACE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Art Department ↗
  • Who funds DFBRL8R LTD #101 ↗
  • Who funds HEAVEN GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds Sweet Water Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Experimental Sound Studio ↗
  • Who funds FOLDED MAP PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley FoundationIL24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Crossroads Fund Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · Builders Vision Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Reva and David Logan Foundation · Walder Foundation · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyde Park Art Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyde Park Art Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hyde Park Art Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph