Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hutton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
83
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.7MInternational$1.0MEnvironment$923kArts & Culture$364kHealth$320kCommunity Improvement$166kCrime & Legal$143kCivil Rights$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $708k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $788k
$10,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$112,500
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$100,000
RESURGE INTERNATIONAL$100,000
STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDER'SFUND$100,000
READING PARTNERS$75,000
PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY$50,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
DEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION$50,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$50,000
UPSTREAM USA$50,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$50,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN$45,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$45,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$40,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $25k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $10k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $10k → 14%MISSION HOSPICE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1k → 7%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $10k → 14%MISSION HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $1k → 7%MISSION HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $1k → 7%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $10k → 14%MISSION HOSPICE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1k → 7%MISSION HOSPICE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1k → 7%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $10k → 14%MISSION HOSPICE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1k → 7%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $15k → 17%MISSION HOSPICE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1k → 7%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $15k → 17%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $5k → 14%MISSION HOSPICE AND HOME CARE: $1k → 7%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $15k → 17%MISSION HOSPICE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $1k → 7%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $15k → 17%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $4k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $3k → 14%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA: $3k → 14%READ GLOBAL: $1k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $9k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $5k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $5k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $5k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $5k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $4k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $1k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $1k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
SD
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 78 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 64 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
15

Total granted

$5.3M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+11%

Still filing today

85%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $298k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RESURGE INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $642k · revenue +64%
  • PO
    PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $615k · revenue +164%
  • RP
    READING PARTNERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS SAILING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -32%
  • N
    NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SONOMA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
6
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
7
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
8
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
9
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Children; the most unlike its peers is Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/94
Grantees still filing
68/94
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,013,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAN…READING PARTNERS: $380,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERSPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $276,240 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMYMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $125,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICADaraja Education Fund: $70,000 · Education+7 more: $198,832 · Education+7 morePENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $615,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPE…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $100,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL…AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRAI…THE JMT WILDERNESS CONSERVANCY: $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE JMT WILDE…+2 more: $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $140,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $135,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOU…NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $60,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $86,500 · OtherTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $80,000 · OtherDEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherSTATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND D/B/A DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND: $100,000 · OtherSTATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FU…FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $95,075 · OtherFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH IN…FOUR WINDS: $59,100 · Other+49 more: $750,286 · Other+49 moreGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $345,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL FUND…KQED INC: $225,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INCTHE WHALE MUSEUM: $56,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WHALE M…COMMON SENSE MEDIA: $35,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $18,000 · Arts & CultureRESURGE INTERNATIONAL: $642,252 · InternationalRESURGE INT…+4 more: $33,000 · InternationalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $232,500 · HealthPARTNERS I…Upstream USA Inc: $150,000 · HealthUpstream U…PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $60,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $48,000 · HealthRape Abuse…Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $40,000 · HealthPlanned Pa…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $30,000 · Health+9 more: $43,872 · Health+9 moreACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $57,000 · Community ImprovementABLE WORKS: $24,000 · Community Improvement
Education$2,063,572Environment$845,000Other$1,740,961Arts & Culture$679,000International$675,252Health$644,372Community Improvement$206,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,013,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRESURGE INTERNATIONAL: $642,252 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $615,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $380,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $345,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $276,240 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $232,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUpstream USA Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $125,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $125,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND D/B/A DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $95,075 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $86,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDaraja Education Fund: $70,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $61,332 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOUR WINDS: $59,100 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WHALE MUSEUM: $56,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JMT WILDERNESS CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $48,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetISSUE ONE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $36,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $36,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $35,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $32,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPursuit Of Excellence: $27,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetICIVICS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATALINO TAPIA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATI: $24,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetABLE WORKS: $24,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RESURGE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds STATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND D/B/A DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Daraja Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUR WINDS ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WHALE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JMT WILDERNESS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
  • Who funds ISSUE ONE ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA30.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Impactassetsinc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Salesforce Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hutton Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hutton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hutton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph