Skip to content
Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Inc

To provide comprehensive and continuous programs to assist people with disabilities entering, remaining, and returning to the work environment.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$249kHuman Services$183kHealth$120kRecreation & Sports$86kArts & Culture$65kEmployment$48kFood & Nutrition$36kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $130,482, the rows itemized in this filing. The $148,905 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,423 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$61M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF MADISON COUNTY$45,000
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY INC$24,982
AUSA REDSTONE - HUNTSVILLE CHAPTER$15,000
DISABILITY RESOURCE NETWORK$10,000
NATIONAL AMBUCS INC$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS ALABAMA INC$10,000
PARKINSONS DYNAMICS$10,000
CATALYST SPORTS INC$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $5k → 17%EPIC INC: $10k → 11%EPIC INC: $7k → 11%DISABILITY RESOURCE NETWORK: $10k → 11%CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEMS FOR THE AGING: $10k → 11%CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEMS FOR THE AGING: $10k → 11%CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEMS FOR THE AGING: $5k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $38k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $10k → 11%FIRST STOP INC: $10k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $8k → 11%THE CARE CENTER: $16k → 11%THE CARE CENTER: $15k → 11%THE CARE CENTER: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 41% of Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 55%.

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$663k · 15 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$663k
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+38%

Still filing today

73%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    United Way of Madison County Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +12%
  • ES
    EIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY
    3× · 2019–2022 · $56k · revenue +76%
  • CO
    CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CS
    Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue +16%
  • MV
    MADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +184%
  • AR
    ALABAMA REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huntsville-Madison County Senior Center Inc

Enable senior citizens to maintain independence

—
2
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
3
Developmental Services of Jackson County Inc

Assists adults with developmental disabilities through vocational and residential programs.

—
4
North Central Alabama Association for Alcoholism

To assist in the recovery and rehabilitation of substance dependent persons who have a sincere desire to overcome their addiction and rebuild their lives

Health
5
Marshall County Arc Inc

To provide educational day habilitation for adults with intellectual disabilities.

—
6
Association for Adults With Developmental Disabilities Inc

Aiding the developmentally disabled.

—
7
Disability Community Resource Center

Disability Community Resource Center (DCRC) is dedicated to: connecting disabled individuals and older adults to resources, training and advocacy tools; promoting disability pride; and building self-determined lives. DCRC works toward…

—
8
Community Access Center

The mission of Community Access Center is to empower persons with disabilities to control their own lives, create an accessible community, and advocate to achieve complete social, economic, and political integration.

Human Services
9
Community Connections Inc

Provide services for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
10
Developmental Services of Dickson County

To provide support and services for persons with disabilities to enable them to become active members of the community.

Human Services
11
The Arc of South Talladega County

Support services for the mentally challenged of south talladega county in alabama.

Human Services
12
The Bridge Inc

To provide treatment and rehabilitative services for juveniles and adults in alabama through contracts primarily with the alabama department of youth services and the alabama department of mental health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eighth Street Community; the most unlike its peers is Association of the United States Army. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Way of Madison County Inc: $230,009 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Madison County IncMADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INC: $18,750 · PhilanthropyMADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INCCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY INC: $51,482 · OtherCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HUNTSVILLE…Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $29,250 · OtherCrisis Services of North Alabama …DIOCESE OF BIRMINGHAM IN ALABAMA INC: $28,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF BIRMINGHAM IN ALABAMA …THE PATHFINDERS INC: $27,500 · OtherTHE PATHFINDERS INCTWO FISH INC: $20,675 · OtherTWO FISH INCGROWCOVE: $19,221 · OtherGROWCOVEALABAMA REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION: $16,987 · OtherALABAMA REHABILITATION ASSOCIATIO…MADISON CITY DISABILITY ADVOCACY BOARD: $16,721 · OtherMADISON CITY DISABILITY ADVOCACY …HOUSE OF HARVEST: $15,300 · OtherHOUSE OF HARVESTSPECIAL OLYMPICS ALABAMA INC: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $12,500 · OtherEIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY: $55,750 · Human ServicesEIGHTH STREET COMMUNITYThe CARE Center: $41,000 · Human ServicesThe CARE CenterCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY: $25,000 · Human ServicesCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FO…EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE IN COMMUNTY INC: $17,400 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE IN CO…SECOND MILE DEVELOPMENT INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSECOND MILE DEVELOPMENT …DISABILITY RESOURCE NETWORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesDISABILITY RESOURCE NETW…First Stop Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesFirst Stop Inc+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesINSIDE OUT STUDIO INC: $54,700 · Arts & CultureMERRIMACK ACADEMY FOR THE PERFORMIN ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMUNITY FREE DENTAL CLINIC: $40,975 · HealthASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY: $25,000 · Public BenefitPARKINSONS DYNAMICS: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsCatalyst Sports Inc: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL AMBUCS INC: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$248,759Other$247,636Human Services$179,150Arts & Culture$64,700Health$40,975Public Benefit$25,000Recreation & Sports$15,500Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Madison County Inc: $230,009 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetEIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY: $55,750 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetINSIDE OUT STUDIO INC: $54,700 over 4y, 28% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF HUNTSVILLE MADISON COUNTY INC: $51,482 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe CARE Center: $41,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FREE DENTAL CLINIC: $40,975 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $29,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PATHFINDERS INC: $27,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY: $25,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMADISON VISIONARY PARTNERS INC: $18,750 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSECOND MILE DEVELOPMENT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDISABILITY RESOURCE NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMERRIMACK ACADEMY FOR THE PERFORMIN ARTS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFirst Stop Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPARKINSONS DYNAMICS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ARC OF MADISON COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALFRED SALIBA FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Alpha FoundationThe Jane K Lowe Chari…Employees Community F…The Daniel Foundation…Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL36.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Alpha Foundation · The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huntsville Rehabilitation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home