· Private foundation
Huntington Clinical Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MU FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| MOUNTWEST FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| EBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $5,000 |
| FAITH-IN-ACTION | $5,000 |
| BIG GREEN SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $5,000 |
| EBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH | $5,000 |
| HOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON | $5,000 |
| MU THOMAS A SCOTT MEDICAL SCHOLARSH | $5,000 |
| GREATER HUNTINGTON PARKS AND REC | $3,867 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MUMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED3× · 2021–2023 · $57k · revenue +116%
- EMEBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC2× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +13%
- HOHOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC3× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- TRTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +29%
- MRMU Research Foundationone grant, 2020 · $8k
- SBSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…
To provide primary care services at no cost to uninsured and underinsured low income residents of west virginia.
Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.
To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.
Health access, inc. is a nonprofit community health care facility, organized as a charitable free clinic, that provides primary medical care and prescription medications to uninsured, low income, adults in a two county area of north…
To provide medical, dental, pharmaceutical and health education service to the uninsured and underinsured poor of west virginia. wv health right also operates a charitable mail order pharmacy for west virginia residents whose income is…
To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.
The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.
To be the best provider of health services through compassion, innovation and excellence.
To collectively strengthen integrated behavioral and primary healthcare system by providing a continuum of services to the community that is responsive, accessible, and high-quality.
To provide home health care services - nursing, therapy and support services to patients in berkeley, morgan and jefferson counties, w.v.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing Hunger Foodbank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mountwest Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds EBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds LILY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015) ↗
- Who funds TEAM FOR WEST VIRGINIA CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Huntington Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo · United Way of the River Cities Inc · Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Stella Fuller Settlement Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Huntington Clinical Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.