Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hunter Hometown Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$202k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$165kAnimals$113kEnvironment$112kYouth Development$100kEducation$49kPhilanthropy$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kHealth$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $128k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
$4,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Working Wheels Inc$20,000
SAHC$15,000
Brevard Music Center$13,000
Open Doors Asheville$13,000
Free Rein Horse Center$13,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,500
Hope Coalition$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,500
Safelight$5,500
Open Doors Asheville$5,500
Sparkpoint$5,500
HCEF$5,500
YMCA$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Working Wheels Inc: $20k → 12%Working Wheels Inc: $6k → 12%CREATING A FAMILY: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 12 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$443k
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+72%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Conserving Carolina
    4× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +234%
  • BR
    Blue Ridge Humane Society Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $53k · revenue +57%
  • HC
    Hope Coalition Corp
    2× · 2023–2024 · $31k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Brevard
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • FS
    FOUR SEASONS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asheville GreenWorks

Asheville GreenWorks inspires, equips and mobilizes communities to create an equitable climate-resilient future.

—
2
Catawba Lands Conservancy

As a nationally accredited land trust, we conserve and manage land for public benefit in North Carolinas Southern Piedmont. We have conserved 235 properties, totaling 17,786 acres of land. We also facilitate the creation of a 1600 mile…

Environment
3
Promoting Animal Welfare in North Carolina

Our main program is providing vet care to animals dropped at or rescued from the local animal shelter. This is the only service we provide and where our expenses go. We spay/neuter animals adopted from the shelter and provide vet care to…

Animals
4
Wnc Communities

WNC Communities empowers the people of Western North Carolina to cultivate the vitality and prosperity of mountain communities through collaboration and agricultural opportunities. This mission is accomplished through a program of work…

Food & Nutrition
5
Balsam Mountain Trust

The mission of the Balsam Mountain Trust is the stewardship of the natural and cultural resources on Balsam Mountain Preserve and the southern Blue Ridge Mountain region, achieved through effective land management practices, scientific…

Environment
6
Friends of the Wnc Nature Center Inc

The Friends is a conservation organization that inspires a passion to know more, care more, and do more for the wildlife of the Southern Appalachians. We advance the critical work of the Nature Center through fundraising, membership,…

—
7
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…

Environment
8
Appalachian Mountain Club

Since 1876, the Appalachian Mountain Club has promoted the protection, enjoyment, and understanding of the mountains, forests, waters, and trails of the Appalachian region. We are the nation's oldest outdoor recreation and conservation…

Environment
9
Naturaland Trust

Performing activities pursuant to the maintenance and preservation of natural areas for the benefit of the public

Environment
10
Humane Society of Hardy County Inc

The Humane Society Hardy County strives reduce feral animal populations while enhancing the health of our communities and providing for those animals that may be adopted, a safe, nurturing, and healthy environment.

Animals
11
Carolina Basset Hound Rescue Inc

The mission of Carolina Basset Hound Rescue is to rescue, rehabilitate and rehome unwanted basset hounds in North Carolina and South Carolina.

Animals
12
Mountain Valleys Resource Conservation & Development Council

To initiate actions that will improve economic conditions, enhance and/or preserve natural resources and balance land and water management activities in a widely divergent geographic area of North Carolina.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asheville Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Key Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Safelight Family: $65,400 · OtherSafelight FamilyIndividual grant recipient: $60,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBoys & Girls Club of Hendersonville: $38,400 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of HendersonvilleHCEF: $34,900 · OtherHCEFBoys & Girls Club of Brevard: $25,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,400 · OtherFOUR SEASONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $20,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB HENDERSON COUNTY: $20,000 · Other+43 more: $234,550 · Other+43 moreConserving Carolina: $64,950 · EnvironmentConserving Car…THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY: $27,700 · EnvironmentTHE PISGAH CON…Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $15,000 · EnvironmentSouthern Appal…NATIVE CONSERVANCY: $4,250 · EnvironmentBlue Ridge Humane Society Inc: $53,000 · AnimalsBlue Ridge H…Charlies Angels Animal Rescue: $28,000 · AnimalsCharlies Ang…ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,000 · AnimalsASHEVILLE HU…APPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $8,000 · AnimalsAPPALACHIAN …Open Doors of Asheville Inc: $18,500 · EducationOrganic Growers School Inc: $17,950 · EducationHope Coalition Corp: $30,900 · HealthW4H ASHEVILLE: $25,500 · Human ServicesCREATING A FAMILY: $3,150 · Human ServicesSAFELIGHT INC: $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$549,450Environment$111,900Animals$97,000Education$36,450Health$30,900Human Services$28,650Philanthropy$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConserving Carolina: $64,950 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBlue Ridge Humane Society Inc: $53,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHope Coalition Corp: $30,900 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCharlies Angels Animal Rescue: $28,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTHE PISGAH CONSERVANCY: $27,700 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetW4H ASHEVILLE: $25,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOpen Doors of Asheville Inc: $18,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOrganic Growers School Inc: $17,950 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSouthern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $8,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSAFELIGHT INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN OFF ROAD BICYCLE ASSOCIATION NC CHAPTER PISGAH AREA: $4,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY: $4,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATING A FAMILY: $3,150 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Conserving Carolina ↗
  • Who funds Blue Ridge Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hope Coalition Corp ↗
  • Who funds Charlies Angels Animal Rescue ↗
  • Who funds THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds W4H ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN & FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors of Asheville Inc ↗
  • Who funds Organic Growers School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds BREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds SAFELIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Carolina Mountain Club Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds KEY LEARNING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC31.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Community Foundation of Henderson County Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · Fernandez Pave the Way Foundation · The Frances & William H Beattie Fdn · Pisgah Health Foundation · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Fletcher Hospital Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hunter Hometown Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hunter Hometown Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hunter Hometown Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hunter Hometown Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hunter Hometown’s filings →

    More from the funding graph