Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hunt Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$276k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.0MHealth$513kHuman Services$494kPhilanthropy$168kHousing & Shelter$85kYouth Development$78kCommunity Improvement$70kEducation$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $156k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLIVET BAPTIST CHURCH$31,226
UNITED WAY OF THE PENNYRILE$28,030
Individual grant recipient$20,090
MIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEW DAY CHURCH$10,000
ST JUDE'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
HOPKINSVILLE CHRISTIAN COUNTY YMCA$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
SANCTUARY INC$7,500
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$7,500
ABUNDANT GRACE MINISTRIES$7,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,500
COMMONWEALTH POLICY FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOX: $5k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%RADICAL MISSION: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%RADICAL MISSION: $10k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%RADICAL MISSION: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
IN
CT
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 47 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
7

Total granted

$2.5M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+97%

Still filing today

28%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +145%
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +147%
  • IT
    IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • HC
    HERITAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • AI
    AGRI-POWER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission of Mercy
2
Christ's Hospital
3
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
4
Cross Made Me Ministries
Religion
5
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
6
Redeemed & Restored

Our mission is simple yet profound, changing lives through christ. we want to help individuals come to christ, being redeemed by his blood and restored and transformed by his word. our goal is to assist individuals struggling with…

Health
7
Medical Missions Outreach Inc

In 2005, medical missions outreach began pointing others to the great physician through an annual medical missions trip to the developing world by partnering with local churches to reach their communities with the gospel. now more than 20…

International
8
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

9
Christian Ministries International
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

12
Compassion Ministries
Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Bailey Barnett Moore Nursing Scholarship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Public University Foundatio…Food Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OLIVET BAPTIST CHURCH — $198,726 · OtherOLIVET BAPTIST CHURCHMIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSIS — $185,000 · OtherMIAMI PROJECT TO CURE PARALYSISUNITED WAY OF THE PENNYRILE — $168,174 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE PENNYRILESALVATION ARMY — $145,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient — $104,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $98,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $92,500 · OtherLIVING HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH INC — $85,000 · OtherNEW DAY CHURCH INC — $83,000 · OtherMISSION VOICE NETWORK — $75,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC — $70,000 · Other+31 more — $702,900 · Other+31 moreRADICAL MISSION INC — $72,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $67,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 · Human ServicesBACK TO BACK INC — $7,500 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC — $65,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $51,063 · ReligionMERIDZO CENTER MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · ReligionCOMMONWEALTH POLICY FOUNDATION INC — $62,500 · Community ImprovementCHALLENGE HOUSE INCORPORATED — $35,000 · Community ImprovementST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $87,500 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $5,000 · HealthNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION SMILE INC — $42,500 · International
Other$2,007,800Human Services$182,500Religion$121,063Community Improvement$97,500Health$92,500Housing & Shelter$50,000International$42,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $87,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRADICAL MISSION INC — $72,500 over 9y, 16% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $67,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC — $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH POLICY FOUNDATION INC — $62,500 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $51,063 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION — $50,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $42,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGE HOUSE INCORPORATED — $35,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY INC — $27,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBAILEY BARNETT MOORE NURSING SCHOLARSHIP INC — $15,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetMOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBACK TO BACK INC — $7,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERSHOT MINISTRIES INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds RADICAL MISSION INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds COMMONWEALTH POLICY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds CHALLENGE HOUSE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds SANCTUARY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hunt Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hunt Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hunt Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph