Skip to content
Hunt C Giles Char - Main at a glance

· Private foundation

Hunt C Giles Char - Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$422kEducation$421kHuman Services$311kReligion$291kHealth$123kYouth Development$102kHousing & Shelter$95kRecreation & Sports$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $244k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOWER UMPQUA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
SUTHERLIN OAKLAND EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY$20,000
THE FISH OF ROSEBURG$20,000
THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN$20,000
ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY KITCHEN$20,000
SUTHERLIN LIBRARY FOUNDATION$15,000
CITY OF ROSEBURG$15,000
FAMILY DEVELOPMENT DOUGLAS CNTY RELIEF$15,000
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$12,500
ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY KITCHEN$11,000
LOWER UMPQUA MINISTERIAL ASSN CHURCH GOD$10,000
SAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
SUTHERLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
THE REEDSPORT COLLECTIVE$10,000
LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $282k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE REEDSPORT COLLECTIVE: $10k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBERG: $25k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $22k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBERG: $20k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $20k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBERG: $20k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBERG: $20k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $15k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBERG: $13k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $13k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 17%THE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $9k → 17%SOURCE ONE SERENITY: $5k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 17%SOURCE ONE SERENITY: $5k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 17%SOURCE ONE SERENITY: $4k → 17%SOURCE ONE SERENITY: $4k → 17%SOURCE ONE SERENITY: $4k → 17%BATTERED PERSONS ADVOCACY INC: $4k → 17%SOURCE ONE SERENITY: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MA
OR
IN
CA
NE
VA
NM
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 56 repeat orgs$478k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
51

Total granted

$1.7M
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+30%

Still filing today

48%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FISH OF ROSEBURG
    8× · 2018–2025 · $149k · revenue +100%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $97k · revenue +40%
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $73k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • GR
    GLIDE REVITALIZATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -5%
  • FD
    FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER DOUGLAS COUNT
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • SC
    SUTHERLIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Sharing Program

Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
2
Southern Oregon Land Conservancy Inc

To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.

Environment
3
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
4
Resource Connections of Oregon

Assisting individuals with developmental disabilities to define, direct and pursue the life they choose through planning and coordination of services and resources.

Health
5
Umpqua Economic Development Partnership Inc

Encourage and facilitate business and economic growth in douglas county, oregon

Community Improvement
6
South Corvallis Food Bank

Increase sustainable food security in South Corvallis by providing emergency food and supplies.

Food & Nutrition
7
Eugene-Springfield Solidarity Network

To provide assistance and awareness of oregon jobs

Civil Rights
8
Earth Day Oregon
—
9
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
10
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
11
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
12
Rogue Action Center

Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Coast Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
33/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPHS CHURCH: $97,700 · OtherST JOSEPHS CHURCHSutherlin Oakland Emergency Food Pantry: $60,000 · OtherREEDSPORT CHURCH OF GOD: $52,700 · OtherSAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Other+83 more: $1,078,516 · Other+83 moreTHE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $148,500 · Human ServicesTHE FISH OF RO…UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $72,500 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNI…Source One Serenity: $25,000 · Human ServicesSource One Ser…FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY DEVELOP…The Reedsport Collective: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $6,100 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC: $97,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF FORDS POND: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE GLIDE COMMUNITY CLUB: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsElkton Community Education Center: $45,500 · EducationSMART READING: $38,000 · EducationCOBB CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $20,000 · EducationSutherlin Booster Club: $19,000 · EducationALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · EducationCOLLEGE DREAMS INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationLower Umpqua Hospital Foundation: $25,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $22,500 · HealthFAMILY FAITH AND RELATIONSHIP ADVOCATES: $16,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $10,500 · HealthSERENITY LANE: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · HealthALS Northwest: $5,000 · HealthA SMILE FOR KIDS: $5,000 · HealthTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN: $72,500 · Food & NutritionNORTH UMPQUA HOLIDAY FOOD & GIFT PROGRAM: $20,000 · Food & NutritionROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC: $31,000 · Housing & ShelterOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $26,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,333,916Human Services$282,100Recreation & Sports$154,000Education$148,500Health$94,000Food & Nutrition$92,500Housing & Shelter$57,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $148,500 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC: $97,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $72,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN: $72,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSutherlin Oakland Emergency Food Pantry: $60,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetElkton Community Education Center: $45,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetSAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF FORDS POND: $45,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME: $40,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetSMART READING: $38,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC: $31,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHIV ALLIANCE: $30,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $26,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLower Umpqua Hospital Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSource One Serenity: $25,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOBB CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSutherlin Booster Club: $19,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetFAMILY FAITH AND RELATIONSHIP ADVOCATES: $16,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oregon Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLIDE REVITALIZATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Reedsport Collective: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSAVING GRACE INC DBA SAVING GRACE HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGE DREAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUMPQUA WATERSHEDS: $10,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOREGON COAST SCHOOL OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetONWARD ROSEBURG: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH LANE FAMILY NURSERY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE GLIDE COMMUNITY CLUB: $10,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSUNRISE ENTERPRISES OF ROSEBURGINC: $6,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR THE UMPQUA RIVERS INC: $5,542 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSERENITY LANE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS Northwest: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPACIFIC CREST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA SMILE FOR KIDS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4,250 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetUMPQUA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetPHOENIX SCHOOL OF ROSEBURG: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSEBURG SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FISH OF ROSEBURG ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds Sutherlin Oakland Emergency Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds Elkton Community Education Center ↗
  • Who funds SAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FORDS POND ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME ↗
  • Who funds SMART READING ↗
  • Who funds ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIV ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds Lower Umpqua Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Source One Serenity ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COBB CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTH UMPQUA HOLIDAY FOOD & GIFT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Sutherlin Booster Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford Family Found…The Oregon Community …The Roundhouse Founda…The Autzen FoundationGreater Douglas Unite…Umpqua Bank Charitabl…The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustFirst Interstate Banc…Dutch Bros FoundationOCF Joseph E Weston P…Noble B Goettel Chari…
The Ford Family FoundationOR86.6× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Greater Douglas United Way · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dutch Bros Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Noble B Goettel Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hunt C Giles Char - Main funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hunt C Giles Char - Main. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Sunrise Enterprises of Roseburginc: 99% of income from government
  • Glide Revitalization: 87% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Community Action: 85% of income from government
  • United Community Action Network: 82% of income from government
  • Family Development Center: 71% of income from government
  • Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Inc: 67% of income from government
  • South Lane Family Nursery Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Hiv Alliance: 54% of income from government
  • Umpqua Watersheds: 41% of income from government
  • Phoenix School of Roseburg: 41% of income from government
  • Family Faith and Relationship Advocates: 40% of income from government
  • Douglas County Children's Center Inc: 24% of income from government
  • College Dreams Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast School of Art: 19% of income from government
  • A Smile for Kids: 19% of income from government
  • Source One Serenity: 16% of income from government
  • Onward Roseburg: 4% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 3% of income from government
  • Elkton Community Education Center: 2% of income from government
  • Casa of Douglas County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Safari Game Search Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Serenity Lane: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
8rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hunt C Giles Char - Main’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home