· Private foundation
Humanitas Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOYOLA HOUSE JESUIT COMMUNITY AT USF | $11,100 |
| NORFIELD CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT | $10,000 |
| THE HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| CATHEDRAL SCHOOL FOR BOYS | $5,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| NORWALK HOUSING FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| STAMFORD ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| FILLING IN THE BLANKS | $309 |
| A BETTER CHANCE OF WILTON INC | $250 |
| RIDGEFIELD OPERATION FOR ANIMAL RESCUE | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNORWALK HOUSING FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +15%
- BNBREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +23%
- RORidgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $1k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- MWMali Wellness Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +25%
- LTLove the Nations Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +50%
- SISOUNDWATERS INCone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.
To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.
Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.
To provide high quality developmentally appropriate educational programs for young children and support for their families.
The wharton club of new york is the networking, career guidance,educational and social forum for the 25,000 plus mba and undergraduatealumni of the wharton school of business to the university of pennsylvania, in the new york city…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life in the village of mamaroneck and the surrounding area. wha constructs new housing and improves existing housing for low and moderate income residents and undertakes other supportive activities…
Loaves and fishes shares god's love by providing food, clothing, and community to our neighbors in a safe and welcoming space. we advocate for a more equitable and just food system in greater new haven. we provide food, clothing and access…
Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…
Wellfare is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in new york city on a mission to solve food insecurity and transform the state of grocery and nutrition in low-income communities. the better box from wellfare is the first free food…
United way of windham county (uwcc) advances the common good by creating opportunities for a better way of life for all, focusing on education, income and health - the building blocks of a better quality of life.
The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Better Chance of Wilton Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love the Nations Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mali Wellness Foundation ↗
- Who funds Love the Nations Inc ↗
- Who funds NORWALK HOUSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SOUNDWATERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MED13L FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANCHOR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds LIVFREE INC ↗
- Who funds WAKEMAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB CORP ↗
- Who funds Ridgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CANCER COUCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A BETTER CHANCE OF WILTON INC ↗
- Who funds WILTON COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The John and Ethel Kashulon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Humanitas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Human Services Council Inc — 27% of income from government
- Wakeman Boys and Girls Club Corp — 11% of income from government
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.