Skip to content
Humane Society of Monroe Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Humane Society of Monroe Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$147kArts & Culture$500Human Services$250
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$919k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARA$3,500
HUMANE SOC OF BLOOMING GROVE$2,750
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLET$1,000
MARTY'S PLACE SENIOR DOG$500
TAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SPECIAL NEEDS ANIMAL RESCUE$500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WALDEN$300
RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE$300
NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE$300
HALFWAY HOME RESCUE$300
DUMPED STRAY ANIMAL RESCUE$300
ELEVENTH HOUR RESCUE$300
PET'S ALIVE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%A GOOD DOG RESCUE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 29 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$141k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+19%

Still filing today

41%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN NY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +101%
  • BK
    BLEU'S K9 RESCUE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • WF
    WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $4k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $700
  • PU
    PAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +47%
  • SH
    SAFE HAVEN MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
3
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
4
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
5
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
6
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
7
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
8
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
9
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
10
Pet Rescue Alliance Inc

Rescue animals from shelter

Animals
11
Safe At Last Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
12
Pats Pets Corporation

Animal rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Chance Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safe Haven Museum and Education Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TARA: $42,500 · OtherTARABLOOMING GROVE ANIMAL SHELTER: $27,500 · OtherBLOOMING GROVE ANIMAL SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARWICK ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,450 · OtherHUMANE SOC OF BLOOMING GROVE: $4,500 · Other+21 more: $22,450 · Other+21 moreTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN NY INC: $7,350 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MI…TAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE INC: $5,500 · AnimalsTAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE …BLEU'S K9 RESCUE INC: $4,000 · AnimalsBLEU'S K9 RESCUE INCWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $3,550 · AnimalsWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SA…FARM SANCTUARY INC: $3,550 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC+16 more: $7,850 · Animals+16 moreNational Mill Dog Rescue: $1,850 · Recreation & SportsA GOOD DOG RESCUE INC: $500 · Human Services
Other$113,900Animals$31,800Recreation & Sports$1,850Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN NY INC: $7,350 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE INC: $5,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBLEU'S K9 RESCUE INC: $4,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $3,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $3,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPETS ALIVE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSULLIAN COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Walden: $850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHalfway Home Rescue Inc: $850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetA GOOD DOG RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWayward Ranch Animal Sanctuary Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUT OF THE PITS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDUMPED & STRAY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARTY'S PLACE SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE RESCUE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALF WAY HOME ANIMAL RESCUE: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MIDDLETOWN NY INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLEU'S K9 RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SULLIAN COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Walden ↗
  • Who funds Halfway Home Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A GOOD DOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Wayward Ranch Animal Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds OUT OF THE PITS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUMPED & STRAY ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Webster Bank Charitab…Verizon FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Richard and Eliza…The Emma and Georgina…The Grey Muzzle Organ…Pedigree FoundationChubb Charitable Foun…Greater Good CharitiesThe Pfizer Foundation…Equitable Foundation …
Webster Bank Charitable FoundationDE17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Richard and Elizabeth Boggio Fo · The Emma and Georgina Bloomberg Foundation · The Grey Muzzle Organization · Pedigree Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Equitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Humane Society of Monroe Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Humane Society of Monroe Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Humane Society of Monroe’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home