Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK

CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK (New York) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,019,334 to it, the largest being THE GUNK FOUNDATION ($687,072). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.8M
Funders on record
29
Grants received
$2.0M
Net assets
$2.2M
18/29 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%
01What it does

What Center for Photography at Woodstock does

Mission

The Center for Photography at Woodstock (CPW) is a vital cultural hub for the Hudson Valley, a gathering place for critical dialogue and creative discovery in photography and visual culture. Our mission is to effect social and personal transformations through innovative and inspiring programs that explore photography as an adept medium for understanding ourselves, our communities, and our society.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Every year cpws exhibitions reach an audience of around 10,000 visitors. Emphasis is placed on representing a diverse range of voices and to engage the public in a meaningful dialogue about photography and the topics it can communicate as an art form.

    $571,781 spent
    47% of program spending
  2. Cpw offers educational programming for all levels of visual thinkers, from beginners to professionals, through workshops, courses, lectures, and symposia. This year, cpw will provide over 300 hours of instruction, most of which will be offered for free to students and other residents of kingston and the surrounding region. This programming will instruct students not only in the practical and technical aspects of photography but also in the history and aesthetics of photography and visual media. Each week, there is meet the artist lecture series. There are also selected panel discussions related to other programming.

    $281,771 spent$1,200 earned by the program
    23% of program spending
  3. Cpws one-of-a-kind artist-in-residence program, woodstock air, was created in 1999 to support photography-based artists of color and to expand the dialogue around diversity, race and identity in the context of social justice. Over 160 artists and writers have participated in this workspace residency to date. Cpws professional workspaces include a state-of-the-art digital media lab and assorted studio spaces. The facilities address the professional and creative needs of the growing number of artists, who live and work in the extended hudson valley region. The lab and studio space are available for hourly rental and make equipment accessible not otherwise available in the area.

    $249,584 spent$114,343 earned by the program
    21% of program spending
  4. Events include the vision awards gala and the annual cpw photobook & zine fair.

    $105,834 spent$13,350 earned by the program
    9% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,208,970.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($446k) Expenses 100 ($310k) Net assets 100 ($288k)2018 Revenue 85 ($378k) Expenses 102 ($317k) Net assets 122 ($353k)2019 Revenue 65 ($288k) Expenses 113 ($349k) Net assets 101 ($290k)2020 Revenue 102 ($454k) Expenses 100 ($309k) Net assets 151 ($435k)2021 Revenue 79 ($352k) Expenses 92 ($285k) Net assets 174 ($503k)2022 Revenue 298 ($1.3M) Expenses 170 ($528k) Net assets 451 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 379 ($1.7M) Expenses 350 ($1.1M) Net assets 669 ($1.9M)2024 Revenue 309 ($1.4M) Expenses 379 ($1.2M) Net assets 750 ($2.2M)2025 Revenue 397 ($1.8M) Expenses 566 ($1.8M) Net assets 763 ($2.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (397)Expenses (566)Net assets (763)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.4M to $3.5M (+150%).

$445k
$482k
$407k
$574k
$592k
$1.4M
$3.5M
$3.9M
$5.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 14% · 2018 6% · 2019 15% · 2020 10% · 2021 19% · 2022 7% · 2023 28% · 2024 25% · 2025 39%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (63% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,377 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$136k
’17
$60k
’18
−$61k
’19
$145k
’20
$68k
’21
$801k
’22
$605k
’23
$201k
’24
$15k
’25
0.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Brian Wallis

Executive director

Board chair

Clinton Cargill

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121412111014191415
Joined·+4+1+1+1+5+6+0+2
No longer listed·23221151
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $99k → $390k.

3 of 29 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 34% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

34%
largest funder
57%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 62% · 2019 60% · 2020 79% · 2021 56% · 2022 61% · 2023 50% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

55% of CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

88% of CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK's grant income comes from New York funders.

MN
IL
NY
PA
CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $46k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK has grown faster than three-quarters of the 3,230 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve0.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,230 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $283k on record.

Federal$283k
grants $283kcontracts $0
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$180k
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services$71k
  • National Endowment for the Humanities$32k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 19%Fundraising 12%

Governance

13
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

77%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK?
CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK (New York) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,019,334 to it, the largest being THE GUNK FOUNDATION ($687,072). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK have?
IRS filings report 29 organizations giving $2,019,334 in grants to CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK, 18 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK?
THE GUNK FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $687,072 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Center for Photography at Woodstock →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 29 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing