· Private foundation
Hubbard Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $17,050 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST OF HOLLIDAY TEXAS | $15,000 |
| THE DAY SCHOOL AT HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN | $10,000 |
| 12TH MAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER (DCAC) | $8,000 |
| A WISH WITH WINGS | $8,000 |
| SKY HIGH FOR KIDS | $7,500 |
| SHEPHERD'S STAFF MISSION FACILITATORS | $6,000 |
| ORPHAN OUTREACH | $6,000 |
| JAKE EHLINGER MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP | $5,000 |
| WILKINSON CENTER | $5,000 |
| KID'S BEACH CLUB | $3,000 |
| M3 GLOBAL MINISTRIES | $3,000 |
| WHITE'S CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $2,000 |
| DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +78%
- COCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC7× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +61%
- AWA WISH WITH WINGS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- SMST MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $10k
- RMRootedWell Ministriesone grant, 2020 · $10k
- EPEMILY'S PLACE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +95%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.
Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coaches Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Armed Forces Athletic Trainers Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
- Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds A WISH WITH WINGS INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LUKE 181 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds M3 MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Orphan Outreach ↗
- Who funds Shepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc ↗
- Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE FIELDS OF DFW INC ↗
- Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS STANDING STRONG ↗
- Who funds RootedWell Ministries ↗
- Who funds EMILY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds KiDs Beach Club ↗
- Who funds GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds UNCHARTED MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Celanese Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Baker Hughes Foundation · America's Charities · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amon G Carter Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hubbard Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.