Skip to content
Huang Pacific Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Huang Pacific Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$318k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$397kReligion$213kInternational$113kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kScience & Tech$56kEducation$53kArts & Culture$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $195k
$27,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$120,000
WTC Huang SNX DAF$75,000
Eisenhower Health Foundation$43,000
CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$30,000
ALL MAY SEE FOUNDATION$27,000
Asian Pacific Fund$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CELEBRATION MINISTRIES INC$1,500
Gospel Center Rescue Mission$1,000
DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 27% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MIT SLOAN ANNUAL FUND: $10k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200k → 7%WTC Huang SNX DAF: $75k → 7%ACE CHARTER SCHOOLS CENTRAL OFFICE: $50k → 8%GIVE2ASIA: $32k → 10%Asian Pacific Fund: $10k → 10%Eisenhower Health Foundation: $43k → 11%DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY: $1k → 12%Gospel Center Rescue Mission: $1k → 12%SYNNEX LEADERSHIP SCHOLARSHIP: $150k → 10%GREATER HORIZONS: $138k → 15%AIR FORCE ACADEMY ENDOWMENT: $2k → 9%MIT SLOAN ANNUAL FUND: $10k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200k → 7%KRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $6k → 8%GIVE2ASIA: $32k → 10%GIVE 2 ASIA: $23k → 10%DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY: $600 → 12%SYNNEX SHARE THE MAGIC: $21k → 10%ANERA: $5k → 14%AIR FORCE ACADEMY ENDOWMENT: $1k → 9%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SLOAN: $10k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200k → 7%KRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $5k → 8%GIVE2ASIA: $22k → 10%DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY: $500 → 12%SYNNEX SHARE THE MAGIC: $10k → 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $180k → 7%KRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NE: $20k → 10%DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY: $500 → 12%SYNNEX LEADERSHIP SCHOLARSHIP: $10k → 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $150k → 7%KRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NE: $10k → 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $120k → 7%KRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NE: $5k → 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $25k → 7%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $36k → 8%CARMEL BACH FESTIVAL: $10k → 12%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $32k → 8%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $30k → 8%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $26k → 8%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $26k → 8%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $26k → 8%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $22k → 8%CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
NM
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$810k · 10 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$810k
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+2%

Still filing today

40%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalReligionEnvironmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $319k · revenue +91%
  • CT
    CANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $209k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $160k

Funded once

  • SF
    SVC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • AC
    ACE CHARTER SCHOOLS CENTRAL OFFICE
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • MI
    MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SLOAN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
4
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
5
World Monuments Fund Inc

Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…

Arts & Culture
6
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

—
7
Audubon Canyon Ranch Inc

Connecting nature, people, and science for a more resilient world.

Environment
8
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
12
Water Environment Federation

WEF's mission is inspiring the water community in pursuit of human and environmental well-being. WEF is a global environmental leader committed to water quality education and technical best practices. WEF connects water professionals;…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Del Monte Forest Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,075,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTGreater Horizons: $138,419 · PhilanthropyGreater Horizons+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $209,000 · OtherCANAAN TAIWANESE CHRISTIAN CHURC…Individual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSVC FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherSVC FOUNDATIONWTC Huang SNX DAF: $75,000 · OtherWTC Huang SNX DAFACE CHARTER SCHOOLS CENTRAL OFFICE: $50,000 · OtherACE CHARTER SCHOOLS CENTRAL OFFI…SYNNEX SHARE THE MAGIC: $30,780 · OtherKRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $26,000 · Other+5 more: $37,600 · Other+5 moreThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation: $319,000 · HealthThat Man May See I…Eisenhower Medical Center: $43,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical…Friends of Children with Special Needs: $35,000 · HealthFriends of Childre…GIVE2ASIA: $107,847 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $5,000 · InternationalCarmel Bach Festival Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCelebration Ministries INC: $4,000 · ReligionGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,223,419Other$688,380Health$397,000International$112,847Arts & Culture$10,000Religion$4,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Environment$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,075,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation: $319,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGreater Horizons: $138,419 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $107,847 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $43,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Children with Special Needs: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCarmel Bach Festival Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCelebration Ministries INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY: $3,600 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Greater Horizons ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Children with Special Needs ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds Carmel Bach Festival Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds Celebration Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds DEL MONTE FOREST CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huang Pacific Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huang Pacific Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Huang Pacific Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Huang Pacific Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huang Pacific’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home