Skip to content
Huang Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Huang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MScience & Tech$1.1MArts & Culture$926kEducation$260kCommunity Improvement$98kPhilanthropy$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$250,000
CITY OF HOPE$50,000
PACIFIC SYMPHONY$25,000
SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VIEN MINH TEMPLE: $5k → 11%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $163k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $335k → 14%PREVENT CHILD TRAFFICING - UNICEF: $2k → 9%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $139k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $256k → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $107k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $250k → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $85k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $250k → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $50k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $46k → 10%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $600 → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $29k → 10%UCLA JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATI: $5k → 14%SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $38k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $10k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $275k → 10%PASADENA SYMPHONY: $8k → 14%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250k → 10%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250k → 10%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250k → 10%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250k → 10%THE BOWERS MUSEUM: $35k → 10%THE BOWERS MUSEUM: $20k → 10%THE BOWERS MUSEUM: $10k → 10%THE BOWERS MUSEUM: $10k → 10%THE BOWERS MUSEUM: $10k → 10%THE BOWERS MUSEUM: $10k → 10%CALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $2k → 10%PACIFIC SYMPHONY: $25k → 10%PACIFIC SYMPHONY: $25k → 10%PACIFIC SYMPHONY: $5k → 10%PACIFIC SYMPHONY: $3k → 10%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUN: $15k → 10%CYSTNOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUN: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 9 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -32% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$3.4M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-32%

Still filing today

89%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +49%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +0%
  • SC
    Segerstrom Center for the Arts
    8× · 2017–2025 · $642k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -57%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CR
    CYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
2
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
Hawaii Symphony Orchestra

To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…

Arts & Culture
5
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
11
American Museum of Ceramic Art

Amoca believes clay is magic. it is a simple yet extraordinary material from which artistic masterpieces are created and everyday products are made. from dinnerware to sculpture to cell phone chips and cosmetics, clay is a part of…

Arts & Culture
12
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Segerstrom Center for the Arts; the most unlike its peers is Inland Empire Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,094,441 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYUCLA FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,275,000 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · HealthSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $642,196 · Arts & CultureSegerstrom Center for the Ar…CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $95,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORP…SOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC: $63,500 · Arts & CultureSOUTH COAST REPERTORY INCPacific Symphony: $58,000 · Arts & CulturePacific SymphonyASIAN HALL OF FAME: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $27,100 · Arts & CultureCITY OF HOPE: $97,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherUCLA JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATI: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $4,000 · OtherInland Empire Community Foundation: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Education$1,344,441Health$1,285,000Arts & Culture$925,796Other$129,500Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,275,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,094,441 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $642,196 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $95,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC: $63,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPacific Symphony: $58,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN HALL OF FAME: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $17,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Symphony ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…The Neisser Family Fo…The Millstream Fund I…California Community …American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…
Orange County Community FoundationCA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · The Neisser Family Foundation · The Millstream Fund Inc · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Huang Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home