Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hrh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
60
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Environment$10MHealth$2.3MInternational$2.2MHuman Services$1.4MCivil Rights$1.1MFood & Nutrition$1.1MPhilanthropy$965kEducation$872kOther$0
02FY2025 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $900k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,650,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$340,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NATIONAL$150,000
LUCILLE PACKARD FOUNDATION (CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL)$125,000
GLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE$125,000
EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL (EASTSIDE PREP)$105,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN$100,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$80,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$75,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$60,000
CHILD & FAMILY INSTITUTE$50,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$50,000
ST LEO'S FOOD CONNECTIONEMERGENCY$50,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$50,000
LIFEMOVES$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $820k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $50k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $35k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $35k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $30k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $30k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $25k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%EVERY CHILD COUNTSPERC: $20k → 9%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $20k → 14%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $20k → 14%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10k → 14%YWCA OF GREATER NEWBURYPORT: $15k → 10%OUR NEIGHBOR'S TABLE: $15k → 10%OUR NEIGHBOR'S TABLE: $10k → 10%OUR NEIGHBOR'S TABLE: $10k → 10%OUR NEIGHBOR'S TABLE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
WY
CT
CA
WV
TN
DC
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 71 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

71 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
6

Total granted

$15M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+39%

Still filing today

73%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +18%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $950k · revenue +74%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $850k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +8%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -2%
  • SU
    STANFOR UNIVERSITYNOR CAL CHAPTER OF ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
7
The 5 Gyres Institute

The 5 Gyres Institute (5 Gyres) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, with a global network of supporters united in the pursuit of a planet free of plastic pollution. 5 Gyres' mission is to empower action against the…

—
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Turtle Island Restoration Network

To mobilize people in local communities around the world to protect marine wildlife and the oceans and inland watersheds that sustain them.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Basic Fund and the most unlike its peers is Marine Applied Research and Exploration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Arts CentersPregnancy Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%47%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%56%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,505

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
50/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $8,310,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYLUCILLE PACKARD FOUNDATION (CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL) — $675,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD NATIONAL — $560,000 · Other+43 more — $6,560,000 · Other+43 moreGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) — $1,075,000 · InternationalGLOBAL AIDS INT…GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $950,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR…International Rescue Committee INC — $850,000 · InternationalInternational R…MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $190,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERN…+2 more — $135,000 · InternationalOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $485,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $355,000 · EnvironmentTen Strands — $270,000 · EnvironmentWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO — $180,000 · EnvironmentPollinator Partnership — $100,000 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $90,000 · EnvironmentVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION — $85,000 · Environment+2 more — $65,000 · EnvironmentEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $702,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $90,000 · EducationTHE BASIC FUND — $75,000 · EducationTIDELINES INSTITUTE — $35,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $210,000 · Human ServicesP E R C INC — $180,000 · Human ServicesYoung Women's Christian Association of Newburyport — $135,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $50,000 · Human ServicesOur Neighbors' Table Inc — $45,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $285,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $150,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $145,000 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $475,000 · Arts & CultureArt Division — $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$16,105,000International$3,200,000Environment$1,630,000Education$907,000Human Services$820,000Health$590,000Arts & Culture$505,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $8,310,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) — $1,075,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $950,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $850,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $702,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $485,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $475,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY INSTITUTE — $375,000 over 9y, 21% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $355,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $310,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $285,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC — $285,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTen Strands — $270,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC — $250,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $210,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC — $200,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $190,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $190,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM — $185,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO — $180,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $180,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetP E R C INC — $180,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC — $175,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWE ARE ALL CRIMINALS — $155,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY INC — $150,000 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $145,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Newburyport — $135,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation — $130,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE APPLIED RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION — $100,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetPollinator Partnership — $100,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $90,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION — $85,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH SOY — $80,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $80,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMy Very Own Bed — $80,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE BASIC FUND — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY — $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ten Strands ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds P E R C INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds WE ARE ALL CRIMINALS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Newburyport ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…Marin Community Found…Crane Fund for Widows…The Bessemer Giving F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…California Community …Silicon Valley Commun…The San Francisco Fou…The David and Lucile …Orange County Communi…The Blackbaud Giving …Ge Aerospace Foundati…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Crane Fund for Widows and Children · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hrh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Triangle Community Center Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hrh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hrh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines