Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howell-Adams Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$191kArts & Culture$85kHealth$55kEnvironment$53kHuman Services$47kFood & Nutrition$35kYouth Development$24kCivil Rights$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL$28,700
LITTLE THEATRE ON THE SQ$12,000
WILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS$5,000
MATTOON PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
POST (PENENSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST)$5,000
CCAR INDUSTRIES$4,200
UNITED WAY OF COLES COUNTY$4,000
MATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$4,000
CORNBELT SHRINE CLUB$4,000
DOUGLAS-HART NATURE CENTER$4,000
HOPE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIO$4,000
COLES COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,500
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $3k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $3k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $3k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $3k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $3k → 11%CCAR INDUSTRIES: $5k → 18%CCAR INDUSTRIES: $4k → 18%CCAR INDUSTRIES: $4k → 18%CCAR INDUSTRIES: $3k → 18%CCAR INDUSTRIES: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$599k · 37 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
4

Total granted

$599k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+9%

Still filing today

27%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CAMP NEW HOPE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +32%
  • CI
    CCAR INDUSTRIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +11%
  • MC
    MATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BF
    BEAUTIFUL FEET CHURCH S B C INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA- REDHAWK DIST
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • TB
    THE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Comal County

To engage the community and focus resources for those in need in comal county

Philanthropy
2
Four County Comprehensive Mental Health Center Inc

Dedicated to holistic care given with compassion, respect, acceptance and hope. achieving emotional well being and independence.

Health
3
Scott County Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put gods love into action habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes community and hope

Housing & Shelter
4
Macomb County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Provide affordable housing for low income families.

—
5
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
6
Habitat for Humanity of Marion County Inc

To provide safe and affordable housing to all.

—
7
Columbia Basin Health Association

To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.

Health
8
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

—
9
Coos County Habitat for Humanity

Construction of homes for low income families. homes built with volunteer labor and sold at cost.

—
10
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
11
Columbia County Community Healthcare Consortium Inc

The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.

Health
12
Central Illinois Veterans Commission

Provide veterans with holistic services designed to eliminate barriers in obtaining permanent sustainable housing.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fish of Sanibel-Captiva Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $114,850 · OtherST JOHN'S LUTHERAN SCHOOLLITTLE THEATRE ON THE SQ: $57,000 · OtherLITTLE THEATRE ON THE SQWILLIAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $27,400 · OtherCAMP NEW HOPE INC: $26,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherMATTOON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24,000 · OtherHOPE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIO: $23,000 · OtherLINCOLN-SARGENT FARM FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherDOUGLAS-HART NATURE CENTER: $18,000 · OtherPOST (PENENSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST): $18,000 · Other+25 more: $164,000 · Other+25 moreCCAR INDUSTRIES: $19,270 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF COLES COUNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyMATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $16,000 · Food & NutritionCOLES COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 · HealthSANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM & VILLAGE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFIVE MILE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education
Other$516,950Human Services$31,770Philanthropy$20,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Health$13,000Arts & Culture$9,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP NEW HOPE INC: $26,700 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COLES COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCCAR INDUSTRIES: $19,270 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $16,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetCOLES COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetColes County Habitat For Humanity: $9,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM & VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFIVE MILE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP NEW HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF COLES COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CCAR INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLES COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds Coles County Habitat For Humanity ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL SEA SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM & VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVE MILE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southeastern Illinois Community FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation · The Lumpkin Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howell-Adams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howell-Adams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howell-Adams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph